Abstract:The software industry has experienced rapid expansion in recent years, with software development now essential to the success of many multinational corporations. The demand for complex software systems has dramatically increased, effective software development has become crucial, given the limitations of resources such as money, time, and labor. Cost and effort calculations significantly impact the development process and client needs, and project failure is often caused by errors in job estimating. Underestimating a project's cost and effort can have severe repercussions, such as exceeding the project's budget. Project overruns, on the other hand, can also have a detrimental impact on software projects' successful completion. Researchers and experts in the software industry are continually exploring ways to keep management and development productivity at high levels. However, standalone estimating models have revealed inadequacies over the last decade, and they have not produced any noteworthy research results. Recent literature suggests that opting for ensemble models would yield better results than standalone models. We have proposed a heterogeneous ensemble effort estimation (EEE) model in this research. Our proposed model comprises standalone estimating models such as Use Case Point, Expert Judgment (EJ), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN). We combined the effort of each unique base model using linear combination rule. To validate our model's effectiveness, we applied it to the benchmark dataset, the International Software Benchmarking Standards Group (ISBSG), using three different variations to avoid biases. We further applied the trained models to industry use cases for cross-validation. Our study's findings demonstrated that, in comparison to stand-alone estimate strategies, the ensemble technique produced better estimation results. Finally, our study proposes a - eterogeneous ensemble effort estimation model that outperforms standalone models in terms of accuracy. This model has the potential to aid in effective software development, particularly in project cost and effort estimation.

A Least Squares Ensemble Model Based on Regularization and Augmentation Strategy

A robust reliability prediction method using Weighted Least Square Support Vector Machine equipped with Chaos Modified Particle Swarm Optimization and Online Correcting Strategy

Deep Residual Surrogate Model

Data efficient surrogate modeling for engineering design: Ensemble-free batch mode deep active learning for regression

MID-ESM: An Adaptive Median-Based Ensemble of Surrogate Models

Using Deep Learning to Improve Ensemble Smoother: Applications to Subsurface Characterization

A Fast Optimization Algorithm Based on Multi-RBF For High-Dimensional and Computationally Expensive Problems

Structural reliability analysis based on ensemble learning of surrogate models

Ensemble learning of multi-kernel Kriging surrogate models using regional discrepancy and space-filling criteria-based hybrid sampling method

The Ensemble of Surrogate Model Based on Local and Global Errors

A Uniform Expression Model for Volumetric Errors of Machine Tools

An Adaptive Interpolating MLS Based Response Surface Model Applied to Design Optimizations of Electromagnetic Devices

Ensemble of surrogates in black-box-type engineering optimization: Recent advances and applications

Multi-Fidelity Surrogate Based on Single Linear Regression

A surrogate-based optimization method with RBF neural network enhanced by linear interpolation and hybrid infill strategy

Error modeling for surrogates of dynamical systems using machine learning

An active learning strategy of reliability-based design and optimization by parallel adaptive sequential importance candidate region method

Heterogeneous Ensemble Model to Optimize Software Effort Estimation Accuracy

A ranking prediction strategy assisted automatic model selection method

Deep Active Learning for Regression Using $ε$-weighted Hybrid Query Strategy

Application of a Dirichlet Distribution-Based Ensemble Surrogate Model in Aerodynamic Optimization