Assessment of a Radiomic Signature Developed in a General NSCLC Cohort for Predicting Overall Survival of ALK-Positive Patients with Different Treatment Types.

Lyu Huang,Jiayan Chen,Weigang Hu,Xinyan Xu,Di Liu,Junmiao Wen,Jiayu Lu,Jianzhao Cao,Junhua Zhang,Yu Gu,Jiazhou Wang,Min Fan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2019.05.005
IF: 4.84
2019-01-01
Clinical Lung Cancer
Abstract:Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive (ALK(+)) patients exhibit unique clinical characteristics. It would be beneficial to effectively predict their treatment outcome. We assessed the performance of the radiomic signature from nonesmall-cell lung cancer for predicting ALK(+) patient outcomes using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator Cox regression model. Its performance was impaired when used for ALK(+) patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Therefore, developing special signatures for patients treated with TKIs might be needed. Background: The purpose of the study was to investigate the potential of a radiomic signature developed in a general nonesmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cohort for predicting the overall survival of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)positive (ALK(+)) patients with different treatment types. Materials and Methods: After test-retest in the Reference Image Database to Evaluate Therapy Response data set, 132 features (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.9) were selected in the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator Cox regression model with a leave-one-out cross-validation. The NSCLC radiomics collection from The Cancer Imaging Archive was randomly divided into a training set (n = 254) and a validation set (n = 63) to develop a general radiomic signature for NSCLC. In our ALK(+) set, 35 patients received targeted therapy and 19 patients received nontargeted therapy. The developed signature was tested later in this ALK(+) set. Performance of the signature was evaluated with the concordance index (C-index) and stratification analysis. Results: The general signature had good performance (C-index > 0.6; log rank P <.05) in the NSCLC radiomics collection. It includes 5 features: Geom_va_ratio, W_GLCM_Std, W_GLCM_DV, W_GLCM_IM2, and W_his_mean. Its accuracy of predicting overall survival in the ALK(+) set achieved 0.649 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.640-0.658). Nonetheless, impaired performance was observed in the targeted therapy group (C-index = 0.573; 95% CI, 0.556-0.589) whereas significantly improved performance was observed in the nontargeted therapy group (C-index = 0.832; 95% CI, 0.832-0.852). Stratification analysis also showed that the general signature could only identify high- and low-risk patients in the nontargeted therapy group (log rank P = .00028). Conclusion: This preliminary study suggests that the applicability of a general signature to ALK(+) patients is limited. The general radiomic signature seems to be only applicable to ALK(+) patients who had received nontargeted therapy, which indicates that developing special radiomics signatures for patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors might be necessary.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?