Abstract:Climate change is expected to alter the magnitude and spatiotemporal patterns of hydro-climate variables such as precipitation, which has significant impacts on the ecosystem, human societies and water security. Global Climate Models are the major tools to simulate historical as well as future precipitation. However, due to imperfect model structures, parameters and boundary conditions, direct model outputs are subject to large uncertainty, which needs serious evaluation and bias correction before usage. In this study, seasonal precipitation predictions from 30 Coupled Model Inter-comparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) models and Climate Research Unit observations are used to evaluate historical precipitation climatology in global continents during 1901-2014. A grid based model heterogeneity oriented Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) is proposed to correct the ensemble mean precipitation bias ratio. Besides, regression based Linear Scaling (LS), distribution based Quantile Mapping (QM) and spatial correlation CNN bias correction approaches are employed for comparison. Results of model performance evaluation indicate that generally precipitation prediction is more reliable in JJA than DJF on the global scale. Most models tend to have larger bias ratio for extreme precipitation. In addition, current CMIP6 models still have certain issues in accurate simulation of precipitation in mountainous regions and the regions affected by complex climate systems. Moreover, the proposed grid based model heterogeneity oriented CNN has better performance in ensemble mean bias correction than LS, QM, and spatial correlation CNN, which could consider the relative model performance and capture the features similar to actual climate dynamics. Climate change continuously affects the magnitude and spatiotemporal distributions of precipitation around the world, which further significantly impacts the ecosystems, human society, and water resources. Global Climate Models (GCMs) are commonly used to predict historical as well as future precipitation. However, these models are not perfect and their predictions may not be accurate enough. In this study, we evaluated precipitation predictions of 30 different GCMs for different parts of the global continents based on precipitation observations from Climate Research Unit during 1901-2014. We find that GCMs tend to be more accurate in predicting precipitation in JJA than in DJF. Moreover, GCMs often have trouble in predicting extreme precipitation events. Results also indicate that GCMs have struggles in accurately predicting precipitation in mountainous regions and regions with complex climate patterns. To correct the biases of GCMs, we proposed a method called grid based model heterogeneity oriented Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and compared it with three traditional methods. The results show that grid based model heterogeneity oriented CNN has better performance in ensemble mean precipitation bias correction. Models perform worse in mountainous regions with complex climate systemThe wet model becomes wetter and dry model becomes drier for extreme precipitation predictionsThe proposed grid-based model heterogeneity oriented Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) has better bias correction performance than Quantile Mapping, Linear Scaling, and spatial correlation CNN

Spatio-temporal Consistent Bias Pattern Detection on MIROC5 Andfgoals-G2

Multivariate bias correction of regional climate model boundary conditions

Assessing multivariate bias corrections of climate simulations on various impact models under climate change

A Deconfounding Approach to Climate Model Bias Correction

Evaluating Biases in Simulated Land Surface Albedo from Cmip5 Global Climate Models

Seasonal and Regional Biases in Cmip5 Precipitation Simulations

Double ITCZs in Coupled Ocean‐Atmosphere Models: Progress in CMIP6

A global perspective on CMIP5 climate model biases

A Probability Density-Based Visual Analytics Approach to Forecast Bias Calibration.

Understanding the alleviation of "Double-ITCZ" bias in CMIP6 models from the perspective of atmospheric energy balance

Evaluation of bias correction techniques for generating high-resolution daily temperature projections from CMIP6 models

Correcting systematic bias in derived hydrologic simulations – implications for climate change assessments

The double ITCZ bias in CMIP5 models: interaction between SST, large-scale circulation and precipitation

Understanding Biases in Indian Ocean Seasonal SST in CMIP6 Models

A Study of Biases in Simulation of the Indian Ocean Basin Mode and Its Capacitor Effect in CMIP3/CMIP5 Models

Bias Correction of Satellite Soil Moisture Through Data Assimilation

Understanding the cold biases of CMIP5 models over China with weather regimes

Investigating the Performance of CMIP6 Seasonal Precipitation Predictions and a Grid Based Model Heterogeneity Oriented Deep Learning Bias Correction Framework

Inter-model Spread of the Climatological Annual Mean Hadley Circulation and Its Relationship with the Double ITCZ Bias in CMIP5

Causes of Model Dry and Warm Bias over Central US and Impact on Climate Projections

Machine learning disentangles bias causes of shortwave cloud radiative effect in a climate model