Origin of Intrinsically Low Thermal Conductivity in Talnakhite Cu17.6Fe17.6S32 Thermoelectric Material: Correlations Between Lattice Dynamics and Thermal Transport

Hongyao Xie,Xianli Su,Xiaomi Zhang,Shiqiang Hao,Trevor P. Bailey,Constantinos C. Stoumpos,Alexios P. Douvalis,Xiaobing Hu,Christopher Wolverton,Vinayak P. Dravid,Ctirad Uher,Xinfeng Tang,Mercouri G. Kanatzidis
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b05072
IF: 15
2019-01-01
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Abstract:Understanding the nature of phonon transport in solids and the underlying mechanism linking lattice dynamics and thermal conductivity is important in many fields, including the development of efficient thermoelectric materials where a low lattice thermal conductivity is required. Herein, we choose the pair of synthetic chalcopyrite CuFeS2 and talnakhite Cu17.6Fe17.6S32 compounds, which possess the same elements and very similar crystal structures but very different phonon transport, as contrasting examples to study the influence of lattice dynamics, and chemical bonding on the thermal transport properties. Chemically, talnakhite derives from chalcopyrite by inserting extra Cu and Fe atoms in the chalcopyrite lattice. The CuFeS2 compound has a lattice thermal conductivity of 2.37 Wm-1K-1 at 625 K, while Cu17.6Fe17.6S32 features Cu/Fe disorder and possesses an extremely low lattice thermal conductivity of merely 0.6 Wm-1K-1 at 625 K, approaching the amorphous limit min. Low temperature heat capacity measurements and phonon calculations point to a large anharmonicity and low Debye temperature in Cu17.6Fe17.6S32, originating from weaker chemical bonds. Moreover, Mössbauer spectroscopy suggests that the state of Fe atoms in Cu17.6Fe17.6S32 is in partially disordered structure which induces the enhanced alloy scattering. All the above peculiar features which are absent in CuFeS2, are contributing to an extremely low lattice thermal conductivity of the Cu17.6Fe17.6S32 compound.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?