Abstract:Background: Although it is critical to understand the accelerated degeneration of adjacent segments after fusion, the biomechanical properties of the spine have not been thoroughly studied after various fusion techniques. This study investigates whether four Roussouly's sagittal alignment morphotypes have different biomechanical characteristics after different single- or double-level spinal fixations. Methods: The parametric finite element (FE) models of Roussouly's type (1-4) were developed based on the radiological data of 625 Chinese community population. The four Roussouly's type models were reassembled into four fusion models: single-level L4-5 Coflex fixation model, single-level L4-5 Fusion (pedicle screw fixation) model, double-level Coflex (L4-5) + Fusion (L5-S1) model, and double-level Fusion (L4-5) + Fusion (L4-5) model. A pure moment of 7.5 Nm was applied to simulate the physiological activities of flexion, extension, lateral bending and axial rotation. Results: Both single-level and double-level spinal fixation had the greatest effect on lumbar range of motion, disc pressure, and annulus fibrosis stress in flexion, followed by lateral bending, extension, and axial rotation. In all models, the upper adjacent segment was the most influenced by the implantation and bore the most compensation from the fixed segment. For Type 2 lumbar, the L4-L5 Coflex effectively reduced the disc pressure and annulus fibrosis stress in adjacent segments compared to the L4-L5 Fusion. Similarly, the L4-L5 Coflex offered considerable advantages in preserving the biomechanical properties of adjacent segments for Type 1 lumbar. For Type 4 lumbar, the L4-L5 Coflex did not have superiority over the L4-L5 Fusion, resulting in a greater increase in range of motion at adjacent segments in flexion and extension. The difference between the two fixations was not apparent in Type 3 lumbar. Compared to the single-level Fusion, the changes in motion and mechanics of the lumbar increased after both the double-level Coflex + Fusion and Fusion + Fusion fixations, while the differences between two double-level fixation methods on adjacent segments of the four lumbar models were similar to that of the single-level fixation. Conclusion: Type 3 and Type 4 lumbar have good compensatory ability and therefore allow for a wider range of surgical options, whereas surgical options for small lordotic Type 1 and Type 2 lumbar are more limited and severe.

Finite Element Based-Analysis for Pre and Post Lumbar Fusion of Adult Degenerative Scoliosis Patients

A New Expanded Cage Designed for Lumbar Disc Herniation: Finite Element Analysis

Finite Element-Based Adjacent Level Analysis of Pre- and Postlumbar Fusion for Scoliosis in Comparison to Healthy Spines

Topping-off surgery vs posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disease: a finite element analysis

Biomechanical Analysis of Adjacent Segments after Spinal Fusion Surgery Using a Geometrically Parametric Patient-Specific Finite Element Model

Adjacent segments biomechanics following lumbar fusion surgery: a musculoskeletal finite element model study

Finite Element Analysis of Implanted Lumbar Spine: Effects of Open Laminectomy plus PLF and Open Laminectomy plus TLIF Surgical Approaches on L3-L4 FSU

Biomechanical effects of lumbar fusion surgery on adjacent segments using musculoskeletal models of the intact, degenerated and fused spine

Effects of dynamic and rigid implantation on biomechanical characteristics of different sagittal alignment lumbar after single- or double-level spinal fixations: a finite-element modeling study

Biomechanical modelling of indirect decompression in oblique lumbar intervertebral fusions - A finite element study

Biomechanical Study of Proximal Adjacent Segment Degeneration after Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Fixation: a Finite Element Analysis

Biomechanical Evaluation of Intervertebral Fusion Process After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Finite Element Study

Biomechanical Evaluation of Four Surgical Scenarios of Lumbar Fusion with Hyperlordotic Interbody Cage: A Finite Element Study

Biomechanical properties analysis of posterior lumbar interbody fusion with transpedicular oblique screw fixation

Biomechanics of Lumbosacral Spinal Fusion in Combined Compression-Torsion Loads

COMPARISON OF FATIGUE BEHAVIORS OF SPINAL IMPLANTS UNDER PHYSIOLOGICAL SPINAL LOADS: A FINITE ELEMENT PILOT STUDY

Biomechanical Comparison of Corticopedicular Spine Fixation versus Pedicle Screw Fixation in a Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Finite Element Analysis Model

Finite element analysis of the lumbar spine in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis subjected to different loads

Biomechanical analysis of lumbar spine with interbody fusion surgery and U-shaped lumbar interspinous spacers

Finite Element Modeling for Biomechanical Comparisons of Multilevel Transforaminal, Posterior, and Lateral Lumbar Approaches to Interbody Fusion Augmented with Posterior Instrumentation

Finite element analysis comparing a PEEK posterior fixation device versus pedicle screws for lumbar fusion