The Value of RANSON Score Combined with BMI in Predicting the Mortality in Severe Acute Pancreatitis: A Retrospective Study
Xu Yin,Xiang Zhong,Jun Li,Ma Le,Shiting Shan,Chunfu Zhu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S356626
IF: 2.145
2022-05-18
International Journal of General Medicine
Abstract:Xu Yin, 1 Xiang Zhong, 2 Jun Li, 1 Ma Le, 1 Shiting Shan, 1 Chunfu Zhu 1 1 Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Changzhou No.2 People's Hospital Affiliated with Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, 213000, People's Republic of China; 2 Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, 226000, People's Republic of China Correspondence: Chunfu Zhu, Email Objective: To explore the value of modified RANSON score in predicting mortality from severe acute pancreatitis (SAP). Methods: In this retrospective study, 461 SAP patients hospitalized from January 2016 to January 2020 were enrolled. AP (acute pancreatitis) patients from our hospital were employed as the training set. In addition, AP patients from the affiliated hospital of Nantong University were set as the validation set. The clinical characteristics of patients were compared between the two sets. The independent risk factors for SAP were determined through logistic regression. Moreover, the risk factors were derived for various prediction models by logistic regression. Multiple methods were adopted to assess the predictive ability of various models. Results: A total of 338 patients were assigned into the training set, while 123 patients were assigned into the validation set. The patients in the training and validation sets showed the consistent distribution trends (P> 0.05). In the training set, significant differences between patients in the non-survival and survival groups were BMI, PCT, platelets (PLT), direct bilirubin (DBil) and RANSON scores (P< 0.05). In further multivariate analysis, BMI, PCT and RANSON score were found as the independent risk factors for the mortality of SAP (OR=1.12, 1.25, 1.28, 95% CI:1.06– 1.19, 1.08– 1.44, 1.12– 1.47, P< 0.05). In the training set and validation set, ROC curve analysis showed that AUC of BMI+RANSON score was 0.778 and 0.789, respectively. In the calibration curve, the fitting degree of RANSON score+BMI and ideal assessment model was 0.975 and 0.854, respectively. The decision curve suggested that the net benefit per patient increased with the lengthening of the RANSON score+ BMI model curve. As revealed by the results of NRI and IDI indicators, RANSON score+BMI was optimized based on RANSON score (P< 0.05). Conclusion: BMI+RANSON was confirmed as a modified model effective in predicting the mortality from SAP. Keywords: SAP, BMI, RANSON score, mortality, model AP is characterized by acute onset and rapid changes. AP patients account for 80%, with the mortality being 1–2%. 1 Twenty percent of AP patients can develop into SAP patients, while 10–20% of SAP patients die from septic shock arising from persistent organ failure and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). 2,3 The 2012 Atlanta Conference consensus suggests that the high mortality from SAP can fall into two phases, including the first week and the first month, in which the causes of death consist of SIRS and persistent organ failure. Accordingly, an early evaluation of AP can improve patient prognosis and reduce the mortality. 4 Common stratification and prognostic models for AP include the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation-II score (APACHE-II), the Computed Tomography Severity Index (CTSI) score, RANSON score and BISAP score, Glasgow scoring system (GCS). Single indicators include PCT, C-reactive protein (CRP), IL-1, IL-6, BMI, etc. Numerous single-center studies have found that the prediction probability of single indicators is equal to that of classical scores, whereas it is difficult to reach a unified prediction value. Moreover, there have been rare good solutions to the shortcomings of index measurement time point and index instability, and the predictive power of indicators continues to be controversial. 5,6 Obesity is not a global problem when RANSON was first proposed, and RANSON was not included in BMI. Over the past few years, some studies have incorporated BMI into APACHE-II, thus increasing the predictive power of APACHE-II. For this reason, classical scores are not perfect, and there is still room for improvement. Since obesity-related diseases have become a global problem, incorporating BMI into RANSON may increase the predictive power of RANSON. 7–9 In this study, the ability of single-indicator, multi-indicator, and modified models were explored to predict the mortality in SAP patients. Furthermore, the possibility of incorporating single indicators into classical scores was studied. In this retrospective study, the training set data were from Changzhou No. 2 People's Hospital Affiliated with Nanjing -Abstract Truncated-
medicine, general & internal