Abstract:BackgroundLink prediction in biomedical graphs has several important applications including predicting Drug-Target Interactions (DTI), Protein-Protein Interaction (PPI) prediction and Literature-Based Discovery (LBD). It can be done using a classifier to output the probability of link formation between nodes. Recently several works have used neural networks to create node representations which allow rich inputs to neural classifiers. Preliminary works were done on this and report promising results. However they did not use realistic settings like time-slicing, evaluate performances with comprehensive metrics or explain when or why neural network methods outperform. We investigated how inputs from four node representation algorithms affect performance of a neural link predictor on random- and time-sliced biomedical graphs of real-world sizes (∼ 6 million edges) containing information relevant to DTI, PPI and LBD. We compared the performance of the neural link predictor to those of established baselines and report performance across five metrics.ResultsIn random- and time-sliced experiments when the neural network methods were able to learn good node representations and there was a negligible amount of disconnected nodes, those approaches outperformed the baselines. In the smallest graph (∼ 15,000 edges) and in larger graphs with approximately 14% disconnected nodes, baselines such as Common Neighbours proved a justifiable choice for link prediction. At low recall levels (∼ 0.3) the approaches were mostly equal, but at higher recall levels across all nodes and average performance at individual nodes, neural network approaches were superior. Analysis showed that neural network methods performed well on links between nodes with no previous common neighbours; potentially the most interesting links. Additionally, while neural network methods benefit from large amounts of data, they require considerable amounts of computational resources to utilise them.ConclusionsOur results indicate that when there is enough data for the neural network methods to use and there are a negligible amount of disconnected nodes, those approaches outperform the baselines. At low recall levels the approaches are mostly equal but at higher recall levels and average performance at individual nodes, neural network approaches are superior. Performance at nodes without common neighbours which indicate more unexpected and perhaps more useful links account for this.

Graph Embedding on Biomedical Networks: Methods, Applications, and Evaluations

Op-cbio190730 1..11

A Survey on Graph Embedding Techniques for Biomedical Data: Methods and Applications

Network Embedding in Biomedical Data Science

A Literature Review of Recent Graph Embedding Techniques for Biomedical Data

Survey of Network Embedding for Drug Analysis and Prediction

A Survey of Network Embedding for Drug Analysis and Prediction

Graph embedding on mass spectrometry- and sequencing-based biomedical data

Neural networks for link prediction in realistic biomedical graphs: a multi-dimensional evaluation of graph embedding-based approaches

Graph representation learning in bioinformatics: trends, methods and applications

Predicting biomedical relationships using the knowledge and graph embedding cascade model

Application and evaluation of knowledge graph embeddings in biomedical data

A Drug Information Embedding Method Based on Graph Convolution Neural Network.

Knowledge Graph Embeddings in the Biomedical Domain: Are They Useful? A Look at Link Prediction, Rule Learning, and Downstream Polypharmacy Tasks

Applications of Network Analysis in Biomedicine

Pre-training graph neural networks for link prediction in biomedical networks

A Complex Network based Graph Embedding Method for Link Prediction

Understanding graph embedding methods and their applications

Graph Neural Networks and Their Current Applications in Bioinformatics

Graph representation learning in biomedicine and healthcare