Vitamin D Intervention Does Not Improve Vascular Regeneration in Diet-Induced Obese Male Mice with Peripheral Ischemia

Kia M Peters,Richard Zhang,Chanho Park,Zengxuan Nong,Hao Yin,Rachel B Wilson,Brian G Sutherland,Cynthia G Sawyez,J Geoffrey Pickering,Nica M Borradaile
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnutbio.2019.04.010
IF: 6.117
2019-01-01
The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry
Abstract:Vitamin D appears to either promote or inhibit neovascularization in a disease context-dependent manner. The effects of vitamin D, alone or in combination with niacin, on endothelial cell (EC) angiogenic function and on revascularization in obese animals with peripheral ischemia are unknown. Here, we report that supplementation of high palmitate medium with vitamin D, niacin or both vitamins increased EC tube formation, which relies primarily on cell migration, and also maintained tube stability over time. Transcriptomic analyses revealed that both vitamins increased stress response and anti-inflammatory gene expression. However, vitamin D decreased cell cycle gene expression and inhibited proliferation, while niacin induced stable expression of miR-126-3p and -5p and maintained cell proliferation in high palmitate. To assess vascular regeneration, diet-induced obese mice received vitamin D, niacin or both vitamins following hind limb ischemic injury. Niacin, but not vitamin D or combined treatment, improved recovery of hind limb use. Histology of tibialis anterior sections revealed no improvements in revascularization, regeneration, inflammation or fibrosis with vitamin D or combined treatment. In summary, although both vitamin D and niacin increased angiogenic function of EC cultures in high fat, only niacin improved recovery of hind limb use following ischemic injury in obese mice. It is possible that inhibition of cell proliferation by vitamin D in high-fat conditions limits vascular regeneration and recovery from peripheral ischemia in obesity.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?