Abstract:Background: Although machine learning is a promising tool for making prognoses, the performance of machine learning in predicting outcomes after stroke remains to be examined. Objective: This study aims to examine how much data-driven models with machine learning improve predictive performance for poststroke outcomes compared with conventional stroke prognostic scores and to elucidate how explanatory variables in machine learning-based models differ from the items of the stroke prognostic scores. Methods: We used data from 10,513 patients who were registered in a multicenter prospective stroke registry in Japan between 2007 and 2017. The outcomes were poor functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score >2) and death at 3 months after stroke. Machine learning-based models were developed using all variables with regularization methods, random forests, or boosted trees. We selected 3 stroke prognostic scores, namely, ASTRAL (Acute Stroke Registry and Analysis of Lausanne), PLAN (preadmission comorbidities, level of consciousness, age, neurologic deficit), and iScore (Ischemic Stroke Predictive Risk Score) for comparison. Item-based regression models were developed using the items of these 3 scores. The model performance was assessed in terms of discrimination and calibration. To compare the predictive performance of the data-driven model with that of the item-based model, we performed internal validation after random splits of identical populations into 80% of patients as a training set and 20% of patients as a test set; the models were developed in the training set and were validated in the test set. We evaluated the contribution of each variable to the models and compared the predictors used in the machine learning-based models with the items of the stroke prognostic scores. Results: The mean age of the study patients was 73.0 (SD 12.5) years, and 59.1% (6209/10,513) of them were men. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves and the area under the precision-recall curves for predicting poststroke outcomes were higher for machine learning-based models than for item-based models in identical populations after random splits. Machine learning-based models also performed better than item-based models in terms of the Brier score. Machine learning-based models used different explanatory variables, such as laboratory data, from the items of the conventional stroke prognostic scores. Including these data in the machine learning-based models as explanatory variables improved performance in predicting outcomes after stroke, especially poststroke death. Conclusions: Machine learning-based models performed better in predicting poststroke outcomes than regression models using the items of conventional stroke prognostic scores, although they required additional variables, such as laboratory data, to attain improved performance. Further studies are warranted to validate the usefulness of machine learning in clinical settings.

Abstract WP203: Prediction of Outcome After Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Machine Learning Approach From Japan Stroke Data Bank

Validating a Predictive Model of Acute Advanced Imaging Biomarkers in Ischemic Stroke

Prediction-Driven Decision Support for Patients With Mild Stroke: A Model Based on Machine Learning Algorithms

Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Undergoing Endovascular Thrombectomy with Machine Learning

Machine Learning for Outcome Prediction of Acute Ischemic Stroke Post Intra-Arterial Therapy

Abstract MP32: Machine Learning Models Identify Predictors of Poor Outcome in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke

Machine learning-based prediction of early neurological deterioration after intravenous thrombolysis for stroke: insights from a large multicenter study

Interpretable machine learning for prediction of clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke

Interpretable Machine Learning Modeling for Ischemic Stroke Outcome Prediction

Prediction of Clinical Outcome in Patients with Large-Vessel Acute Ischemic Stroke: Performance of Machine Learning versus SPAN-100

Predicting Clinical Outcomes of Large Vessel Occlusion Before Mechanical Thrombectomy Using Machine Learning.

Prediction of large vessel occlusion for ischaemic stroke by using the machine learning model random forests

An explainable machine learning model for predicting the outcome of ischemic stroke after mechanical thrombectomy

Machine learning prediction of hospital discharge disposition for inpatients with acute ischemic stroke following mechanical thrombectomy in the United States

Abstract TP104: Functional Prognostication of Patients Receiving Thrombolytics in Acute Ischemic Stroke With Machine Learning

Machine Learning-Based Three-Month Outcome Prediction in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Single Cerebrovascular-Specialty Hospital Study in South Korea

Abstract WP266: Prediction of Stroke Incidence Using Machine Learning: The Suita Study

Development of machine learning models for predicting outcome in patients with distal medium vessel occlusions: a retrospective study

Abstract 106: Novel Imaging-based Morphological Markers For Improved Prediction Of Stroke Outcomes: A Machine Learning Approach

Combining clinical and imaging data for predicting functional outcomes after acute ischemic stroke: an automated machine learning approach

Predictive Performance of Machine Learning-Based Models for Poststroke Clinical Outcomes in Comparison With Conventional Prognostic Scores: Multicenter, Hospital-Based Observational Study