Abstract:With the introduction of neuron coverage as a testing criterion for deep neural networks (DNNs), covering more neurons to detect more internal logic of DNNs became the main goal of many research studies. While some works had made progress, some new challenges for testing methods based on neuron coverage had been proposed, mainly as establishing better neuron selection and activation strategies influenced not only obtaining higher neuron coverage, but also more testing efficiency, validating testing results automatically, labeling generated test cases to extricate manual work, and so on. In this article, we put forward Test4Deep, an effective white-box testing DNN approach based on neuron coverage. It is based on a differential testing framework to automatically verify inconsistent DNNs' behavior. We designed a strategy that can track inactive neurons and constantly triggered them in each iteration to maximize neuron coverage. Furthermore, we devised an optimization function that guided the DNN under testing to deviate predictions between the original input and generated test data and dominated unobservable generation perturbations to avoid manually checking test oracles. We conducted comparative experiments with two state-of-the-art white-box testing methods DLFuzz and DeepXplore. Empirical results on three popular datasets with nine DNNs demonstrated that compared to DLFuzz and DeepXplore, Test4Deep, on average, exceeded by 32.87% and 35.69% in neuron coverage, while reducing 58.37% and 53.24% testing time, respectively. In the meantime, Test4Deep also produced 58.37% and 53.24% more test cases with 23.81% and 98.40% fewer perturbations. Even compared with the two highest neuron coverage strategies of DLFuzz, Test4Deep still enhanced neuron coverage by 4.34% and 23.23% and achieved 94.48% and 85.67% higher generation time efficiency. Furthermore, Test4Deep could improve the accuracy and robustness of DNNs by merging generated test cases and retraining.

Variable Strength Combinatorial Testing for Deep Neural Networks.

There is Limited Correlation Between Coverage and Robustness for Deep Neural Networks

An Empirical Study on Correlation between Coverage and Robustness for Deep Neural Networks

Research on Image Classification Method of Features of Combinatorial Convolution

Generating Variable Strength Combinatorial Test Suite with One-test-at-a-time Strategy

Assessing Systematic Weaknesses of DNNs using Counterfactuals

Improving Model Robustness Against Adversarial Examples with Redundant Fully Connected Layer.

A White-Box Testing for Deep Neural Networks Based on Neuron Coverage.

DeepPath: Path-driven Testing Criteria for Deep Neural Networks

In Defense of Simple Techniques for Neural Network Test Case Selection

Neural Group Testing to Accelerate Deep Learning

CLEVEREST: Accelerating CEGAR-based Neural Network Verification via Adversarial Attacks

Composite Backdoor Attack for Deep Neural Network by Mixing Existing Benign Features

Test4Deep: an Effective White-Box Testing for Deep Neural Networks

Revisiting Deep Neural Network Test Coverage from the Test Effectiveness Perspective

Behavior Pattern-Driven Test Case Selection for Deep Neural Networks.

Boosting Operational DNN Testing Efficiency Through Conditioning

DeepKnowledge: Generalisation-Driven Deep Learning Testing

A Search-Based Testing Framework for Deep Neural Networks of Source Code Embedding

Testing Deep Learning Models: A First Comparative Study of Multiple Testing Techniques

UNIT: Backdoor Mitigation via Automated Neural Distribution Tightening