Abstract:Several studies have shown the presence of large anisotropies for tactile distance perception across several parts of the body. The tactile distance between two touches on the dorsum of the hand is perceived as larger when they are oriented mediolaterally (across the hand) than proximodistally (along the hand). This effect can be partially explained by the characteristics of primary somatosensory cortex representations. However, this phenomenon is significantly attenuated relative to differences in acuity and cortical magnification, suggesting a process of tactile size constancy. It is unknown whether the same kind of compensation also takes place when estimating the size of a continuous object. Here, we investigate whether the tactile anisotropy that typically emerges when participants have to estimate the distance between two touches is also present when a continuous object touches the skin and participants have to estimate its size. In separate blocks, participants judged which of two tactile distances or objects on the dorsum of their hand felt larger. One stimulation (first or second) was aligned with the proximodistal axis (along the hand) and the other with the mediolateral axis (across the hand). Results showed a clear anisotropy for distances between two distinct points, with across distances consistently perceived as larger than along distances, as in previous studies. Critically, however, this bias was significantly reduced or absent for judgments of the length of continuous objects. These results suggest that a tactile size constancy process is more effective when the tactile size of an object has to be approximated compared to when the distance between two touches has to be determined. The possible mechanism subserving these results is described and discussed. We suggest that a lateral inhibition mechanism, when an object touches the skin, provides information through the distribution of the inhibitory subfields of the RF about the shape of the tactile RF itself. Such a process allows an effective tactile size compensatory mechanism where a good match between the physical and perceptual dimensions of the object is achieved.

Somatotopic representation of tactile duration: evidence from tactile duration aftereffect.

Electrophysiological correlates of the somatotopically organized tactile duration aftereffect

An EEG Investigation of Tactile Duration Adaptation

Duration Aftereffect Depends on the Duration of Adaptation

[Research Advances on the Duration Aftereffect].

The Aftereffect of Perceived Duration is Contingent on Auditory Frequency but Not Visual Orientation

Color Sensitivity of the Duration Aftereffect Depends on Sub- and Supra-second Durations

Accuracy Feedback and Delay Adaptation Effects in Visual and Tactile Duration Reproduction

Spatial Selectivity of the Visual Duration Aftereffect in the Sub-Second Range: an Event-Related Potentials Study

Neural Correlates of Aftereffects Induced by Adaptations to Single and Average Durations.

Prolonged subjective duration near the hands: Effects of hand proximity on temporal reproduction

Cortical integration of tactile inputs distributed across timescales

Visual Duration Aftereffect is Position Invariant

Tactile adaptation to orientation produces a robust tilt aftereffect and exhibits crossmodal transfer when tested in vision

Stimulus Intervals Modulate the Balance of Brain Activity in the Human Primary Somatosensory Cortex: an ERP Study.

Size Constancy Mechanisms: Empirical Evidence from Touch

Duration Comparisons for Vision and Touch Are Dependent on Presentation Order and Temporal Context

Reliability of tactile perception and suppression measurements

Predictions of bimanual self-touch determine the temporal tuning of somatosensory perception

Linking Signal Relevancy and Intensity in Predictive Tactile Suppression

A sensory integration account for time perception