OGLE-2018-BLG-0532Lb: Cold Neptune with Possible Jovian Sibling

Yoon-Hyun Ryu,Andrzej Udalski,Jennifer C. Yee,Matthew T. Penny,Weicheng Zang,Michael D. Albrow,Sun-Ju Chung,Andrew Gould,Cheongho Han,Kyu-Ha Hwang,Youn Kil Jung,In-Gu Shin,Yossi Shvartzvald,Sang-Mok Cha,Dong-Jin Kim,Hyoun-Woo Kim,Seung-Lee Kim,Chung-Uk Lee,Dong-Joo Lee,Yongseok Lee,Byeong-Gon Park,Richard W. Pogge,Przemek Mroz,Michal K. Szymanski,Jan Skowron,Radek Poleski,Igor Soszynski,Pawel Pietrukowicz,Szymon Kozlowski,Krzysztof Ulaczyk,Krzysztof A. Rybicki,Patryk Iwanek,Marcin Wrona,Shude Mao,Pascal Fouque,Wei Zhu,Tianshu Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/abaa3f
2020-01-01
The Astronomical Journal
Abstract:We report the discovery of the planet OGLE-2018-BLG-0532Lb, with very obvious signatures in the light curve that lead to an estimate of the planet-host mass ratio q - M-planet/M-host similar or equal to 1 x 10(-4). Although there are no obvious systematic residuals to this double-lens/single-source (2L1S) fit, we find that chi(2) can be significantly improved by adding either a third lens (3L1S, Delta chi(2) = 81) or second source (2L2S, Delta chi(2) = 77) to the lens-source geometry. After thorough investigation, we conclude that we cannot decisively distinguish between these two scenarios and therefore focus on the robustly detected planet. However, given the possible presence of a second planet, we investigate to what degree and with what probability such additional planets may affect seemingly single-planet light curves. Our best estimates for the properties of the lens star and the secure planet are a host mass M similar to 0.25 M-circle dot, system distance D-L similar to 1 kpc, and planet mass m(p,1) = 8 M-circle plus with projected separation a(1,perpendicular to). However, there is a relatively brightI = 18.6 (and also relatively blue) star projected within <50 mas of the lens, and if future high-resolution images show that this is coincident with the lens, then it is possible that it is the lens, in which case, the lens would be both more massive and more distant than the best-estimated values above.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?