Head-to-head comparative pharmacokinetic and biodistribution (PK/BD) study of two dexamethasone prodrug nanomedicines on lupus-prone NZB/WF1 mice
Xin Wei,Gang Zhao,Xiaobei Wang,Nagsen Gautam,Zhenshan Jia,Zhifeng Zhao,Dexuan Kong,Fan Zhang,Sushil Kumar,Yuanyuan Sun,Ningrong Chen,Xiaoyan Wang,Libin Yang,Rongguo Ren,Geoffrey M Thiele,Tatiana K Bronich,James R O'Dell,Yazen Alnouti,Dong Wang,Geoffrey M. Thiele,Tatiana K. Bronich,James R. O'Dell
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nano.2020.102266
2020-10-01
Abstract:<p>HPMA copolymer-based dexamethasone prodrug (P-Dex) and PEG-based dexamethasone prodrug (PEG-Dex, ZSJ-0228) were previously found to passively target the inflamed kidney and provide potent and sustained resolution of nephritis in NZB/W F1 lupus-prone mice. While both prodrug nanomedicines effectively ameliorate lupus nephritis, they have demonstrated distinctively different safety profiles. To explore the underlining mechanisms of these differences, we conducted a head-to-head comparative PK/BD study of P-Dex and PEG-Dex on NZB/W F1 mice. Overall, the systemic organ/tissue exposures to P-Dex and Dex released from P-Dex were found to be significantly higher than those of PEG-Dex. The high prodrug concentrations were sustained in kidney for only 24 hours, which cannot explain their lasting therapeutic efficacy (> 1 month). P-Dex showed sustained presence in liver, spleen and adrenal gland, while the presence of PEG-Dex in these organs was transient. This difference in PK/BD profiles may explain PEG-Dex' superior safety than P-Dex.</p>
medicine, research & experimental,nanoscience & nanotechnology