Abstract:The traditional method for calculating the buffeting response of long-span bridges follows the strip assumption, and is carried out by identifying aerodynamic parameters through sectional model force or pressure measurement wind tunnel tests. However, there has been no report on predicting the buffeting response based on the sectional model vibration test. In recent years, the author has proposed a method, based on the integrated transfer function, for predicting the buffeting response of long-span bridges through theoretical and full-bridge tests. This provided an idea for predicting the buffeting response based on the sectional model vibration test. Unfortunately, the effectiveness and accuracy of this method have not been proven or demonstrated through effective tests. To solve this problem, a long-span suspension bridge was taken as a background. Parameters such as aerodynamic admittance were identified through a sectional model force measurement test and the integrated transfer functions were identified through a sectional model vibration test. A taut strip model test was also conducted. Furthermore, the buffeting response prediction results based on three kinds of wind tunnel test techniques were compared. The results showed that if the strip assumption was established, the results of the three methods aligned well, and that selecting a reasonable model aspect ratio for the test could effectively reduce the influence of the 3D effect; moreover, identifying the integrated transfer function by the sectional model vibration test could effectively predict the long-span bridge buffeting response. Furthermore, when the strip assumption failed, the results of the traditional calculation method using 3D aerodynamic admittance became smaller. A larger result would be obtained by neglecting the influence of aerodynamic admittance.

Experimental Determination of Aerodynamic Admittance Functions of a Bridge Deck Considering Oscillation Effect

Revisiting Aerodynamic Admittance Functions of Bridge Decks

Combining Active and Passive Wind Tunnel Tests to Determine the Aerodynamic Admittances of a Bridge Girder

Strategies for identifying the two-dimensional aerodynamic admittance functions of a bridge deck

A Statistical Approach to the Identification of the Two-Dimensional Aerodynamic Admittance of Streamlined Bridge Decks

Quantifying the Aerodynamic Admittance and Spanwise Coherence Functions of Buffeting Lift for Bridge Decks Through the Measurement of Segmental Forces

Aerodynamic Admittance Influence on Buffeting Performance of Suspension Bridge with Streamlined Deck

Two-Dimensional Aerodynamic Admittance Of A Flat Closed-Box Bridge

Nonlinear Aerodynamic Forces on Bridge Decks due to Transverse Sinusoidal Fluctuation of Wind

Experimental Determination of the Two-Dimensional Aerodynamic Admittance of Typical Bridge Decks

Experimental determination of bridge deck aeroelastic derivatives by stochastic subspace technique

Aerodynamic Admittances of Bridge Deck Sections: Issues and Wind Field Dependence

Advances in modeling boundary layer turbulence and its effects on motion independent aerodynamic force of bridge decks

Determination of Aerodynamic Admittance Functions of Bridge Decks by Covariance-driven Stochastic Subspace Identification Technique

An Advanced Approach to Determining the Spanwise Coherence of the Buffeting Forces on Bridge Decks with Complex Configurations

Identification of Two-Dimensional Aerodynamic Admittance of a Central-Slotted Box Girder Based on Force-Balance Measurements

Buffeting Response Prediction of Long-Span Bridges Based on Different Wind Tunnel Test Techniques

Aerodynamic Admittance of Streamlined Bridge Decks

Experimental Investigations on Aerostatic Characteristics of Bridge Decks under Various Conditions

Postflutter Analysis of Bridge Decks Using Aerodynamic-Describing Functions

Reduced differential equation aerodynamic buffeting model of typical streamlined bridge cross-section