Social Class Stereotype:Its Impact and Theoretical Explanation
Chen Sai,Yan Lei,Hu Xiuyin,Zhang Yanhong,Chen Wanyi,Wu Bowen,Yang Linchuan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20230218
2023-01-01
Abstract:Social class stereotype is a fixed psychological schema of different social classes. The stereotype content model provides a theoretical framework focusing on the perceived warmth and competence of different social classes. Competence refers to the possibility of the group to realize its intention, which depends on the status of the group（income, wealth, education, job prestige, or title）. Warmth represents the group’s behavioral intentions, which depend on the willingness to cooperate or the threat of competition. Individuals with high socioeconomic status are perceived ambivalently as competent but cold, whereas Individuals with low socioeconomic status are considered as less competent but warm.Social class stereotypes may affect people’s cognition, emotion, and behaviors. In terms of cognitive effects, social class stereotypes could interfere with memory processes and lead to memory errors during retrieval tasks. In terms of emotional effects, social class stereotypes can help maintain a sense of social justice by positing designating compensatory stereotypes to different classes, in which people with either high or low socioeconomic status have unique advantages. In terms of behavioral effects, social class stereotypes affect students’ performance and impression management strategies. Social class stereotypes could negatively affect students’ performance, especially on low-class students doing evaluative tasks.Moreover, in cross-class communication, class stereotypes may affect the choice of impression management strategy. For example, when interacting with subordinates, show tend to project more warmth than competence, whereas when interacting with superiors, they tend to show images with higher competence rather than warmth.Theories that are often invoked to explain the effects of class stereotypes include the system justification theory and the BIAS map theory. The BIAS map treats "warmth" and "competence" as universal dimensions of stereotypes and emphasizes the direct influence of specific class stereotype content on class interaction. The system justification theory believes that individuals are motivated to justify their own social status, and complimentary class stereotypes could meet such justification motivation. This theory emphasizes the indirect influence of class stereotypes on class interaction.Both the BIAS map and the system justification theory recognize the critical role of social class stereotypes in class interaction. However, ther are fundamental differences between the two theories. According to the BIAS map, class stereotypes may lead to negative emotional experiences and behaviors. In contrast, according to the system justification theory, the complementary stereotypes could cause positive emotional experience as they could preserve a semblance of social justice. The main reason for the disagreement is differences in perspectives specifically. The BIAS map theory considers social class stereotypes to be tools to remain dominant and to justify their monopoly on material or psychological resources, while the system justification theory considers social class stereotypes to be psychological resources to cope with stresses and dissonances caused by unequal social structure.Future research could（1） clarify the research orientation and the operational definition of class stereotype,（2） expand research on the effects of class stereotype and its intervention strategies, and（3） integrate the theoretical explanations for the effects of class stereotype.