Immune Escape Correlates With An Inflamed Phenotype In Malignant Mesothelioma.

Arun Khattri,Zhixiang Zuo,Aliya Noor Husain,Hedy Lee Kindler,Tanguy Y. Seiwert
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.7566
IF: 45.3
2015-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:7566 Background: Malignant mesothelioma (MM) is commonly associated with an inflammatory reaction, although the specific patterns of immune escape remain incompletely understood. We used emerging, high-fidelity gene expression data from the TCGA Mesothelioma cohort to interrogate subgroups based on expression of immune related genes, and determined associated immune escape mechanisms. Methods: RNA-seq data from 76 MM from TCGA were analyzed using genes representative of 1. T-cells, 2. NK-cells, 3. neutrophils, 4. dendritic cells/macrophages, as well as genes associated with immune escape (immune checkpoints and cellular immune escape). Using this gene set, unsupervised, hierarchical clustering was performed to identify intrinsic immune subgroups. Groups were correlated with T-cell inflammation (Kindler ASCO 2014), based on the 12-gene inflammation signature (Harlin/Gajewski Cancer Res 2009). Results: MM tumors readily clustered into two large groups with 35% of tumors showing high levels of inflammation (group 1), presence of all four immune cell components, and 80% of tumors showing a TCIP-high phenotype. Non-inflamed tumors (group 2) showed low immune cell related gene expression and were 85% non-T-cell inflamed. Prominent immune escape was present in all group 1 tumors, including expression of PD-1/PD-L1, CTLA4, LAG3, and FOXP3 (however not B7H3). Inflammation strongly correlated with presence of immune escape (functional immune response) in group 1, while group 2 tumors exhibited neither infiltration with immune cells, nor immune escape (immunological ignorance). Conclusions: MM can be classified into inflamed/group 1 and non-inflamed/group 2 tumors. Group 1 tumors show simultaneous infiltration with multiple immune cell components, and prominent immune escape. Inflamed and non-inflamed MM may require differential treatment strategies for immunotherapy.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?