Abstract:Background Integrating a chemical nitrogen (N) fertilizer with an organic fertilizer and using slow-release mechanism are important N management strategies to increase the N utilization efficiency (NUE) and grain yield of rice. However, the performances of both N management strategies on the productivity, the nutrient absorption and utilization efficiency, and the economic benefits of rice have not yet been comprehensively evaluated. Methods A 2-year field experiment was conducted with seven N management strategies without fertilizer (control), 100% conventional N fertilizer (conventional compound fertilizer and urea) (N 100 ), 75% conventional N fertilizer with 25% organic–inorganic compound fertilizer (N 75 +OICF 25 ), 50% conventional N fertilizer with 50% organic–inorganic compound fertilizer (N 50 +OICF 50 ), 100% organic–inorganic compound fertilizer (OICF 100 ), slow-release compound fertilizer with urea (SRCF+U), compound fertilizer with sulfur-coated urea (CF+SCU). The responses of the productivity, the nutrient absorption and utilization efficiency, and the economic benefits of rice to the different N management strategies were evaluated. Results CF+SCU performed comparably or better than N 100 , judging by the grain yield (GY), the N, phosphate (P) and potassium (K) agronomic efficiency (NAE, PAE and KAE), and the apparent N, P and K recovery efficiency (ANRE, APRE and AKRE). SRCF+U significantly increased the GY by an average of 7.7%, the NAE and the ANRE by 23.8 and 26.7%, the PAE and the APRE by 90.6 and 109.3%, and the KAE and the AKRE by 74.2 and 57.7%. The higher GY and nutrient utilization efficiency when using SRCF+U were attributed to the higher total biomass and total nutrient absorption. N 75 +OICF 25 and N 50 +OICF 50 produced a comparable grain yield than N 100 , whereas a significant yield reduction was observed when using OICF 100 . Compared with N 100 , N 75 +OICF 25 resulted in a comparable or higher fertilizer use efficiency (0.3 and 4.7% for NAE and ANRE, 0.3 and 3.2% for PAE and APRE, 0.3 and −2.8% for KAE and AKRE). However, the fertilizer use efficiency when using N 50 +OICF 50 and OICF 100 were lower than with N 100 . The highest net return (NR) (5,845.03 yuan ha −1 ) and benefit to cost (B:C) ratio (0.34) were obtained when using SRCF+U. The NR and the B:C ratio when using N 75 +OICF 25 were slightly higher than when using N 100. However, N 50 +OICF 50 and OICF 100 significantly decreased the NR and the B:C ratio compared with N 100 by 14.5 and 12.1% and by 35.1 and 29.0%, respectively. Conclusions SRCF+U and CF+SCU enhanced the crop productivity, the nutrient uptake and utilization efficiency, and the economic benefits compared with N 100. The comprehensive performance of SRCF+U was better than that of CF+SCU. N 75 +OICF 25 produced almost similar productivity, nutrient uptake and use efficiency compared with N 100 . It demonstrated that N 75 +OICF 25 stabilized the grain yield production of rice and reduced the input of chemical N fertilizer.

Organic-substitute Strategies Reduced Carbon and Reactive Nitrogen Footprints and Gained Net Ecosystem Economic Benefit for Intensive Vegetable Production

Biochar and organic substitution improved net ecosystem economic benefit in intensive vegetable production

Reactive nitrogen releases and nitrogen footprint during intensive vegetable production affected by partial human manure substitution

Combined applications of organic and synthetic nitrogen fertilizers for improving crop yield and reducing reactive nitrogen losses from China’s vegetable systems: A meta-analysis

Organic substitutions aggravated microbial nitrogen limitation and decreased nitrogen-cycling gene abundances in a three-year greenhouse vegetable field

Bio-manure substitution declines soil N2O and NO emissions and improves nitrogen use efficiency and vegetable quality index

Bio-organic substitution in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L) cultivation: Optimum strategy to lower carbon footprint and boost net ecosystem economic benefit

Assessing economic and environmental impacts of subsidies for organic fertilizer in vegetable production: insights from a combined PMP-LCA-LCC approach

Effects of Partial Substitution of Organic Fertilizer for Synthetic N Fertilizer on Yield and N Use Efficiencies in a Semiarid Winter Wheat–Summer Maize Rotation

The environmental and socioeconomic benefits of optimized fertilization for greenhouse vegetables

Reducing N2O and NO emissions while sustaining crop productivity in a Chinese vegetable-cereal double cropping system

Benefits and trade-offs of replacing inorganic fertilizer by organic substrate in crop production: A global meta-analysis

Growth and Yield Responses of Crops and Macronutrient Balance Influenced by Commercial Organic Manure Used As A Partial Substitute for Chemical Fertilizers in an Intensive Vegetable Cropping System

Assessment of productivity, nutrient uptake and economic benefits of rice under different nitrogen management strategies

Long-Term Fertilizer Reduction in Greenhouse Tomato-Cucumber Rotation System to Assess N Utilization, Leaching, and Cost Efficiency

Effect of Mild Organic Substitution on Soil Quality and Microbial Community

Organic Vegetable Cultivation Reduces Resource and Environmental Costs While Increasing Farmers’ Income in the North China Plain

Effects of equal chemical fertilizer substitutions with organic manure on yield, dry matter, and nitrogen uptake of spring maize and soil nitrogen distribution

Improving potential of reactive nitrogen and carbon footprint of intensified greenhouse cucumber-tomato production with optimized drip irrigation with nitrogen reduction strategies

Optimal N management improves crop yields and soil carbon, nitrogen sequestration in Chinese cabbage-maize rotation

Effects of the Ratio of Substituting Mineral Fertilizers with Manure Nitrogen on Soil Properties and Vegetable Yields in China: A Meta-Analysis