Abstract P219: Central Obesity and All-cause and Cause Specific Mortality: a Systematic Review and Dose-response Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies

Tao Huang,Tingting Geng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.139.suppl_1.p219
IF: 37.8
2019-01-01
Circulation
Abstract:Background: The association of central obesity and mortality risk has not been systematically investigated. The strength and shape of dose-response relationship between central obesity and all-cause and cause specific mortality still remains unclear. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to clarify the associations. Methods: Categorical and dose-response meta-analysis was conducted involving of prospective studies. PubMed and Embase were searched up to April 1st, 2017 for eligible studies of waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio and all-cause and cause specific mortality. Random-effects models were used to derive the summary relative risks (RRs) and corresponding 95% CI for specific categories of central obesity and a continuous association using generalized least-squares trend estimation. Results: A total of 1 760 947 participants in 50 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled RRs for a 10 cm increase in waist circumference were 1.06 (95% CI, 1.04-1.08; I 2 =92.9%), 1.06 (95% CI, 1.03-1.08; I 2 =90.9%), 1.21 (95% CI, 1.06-1.35; I 2 =88.1%) and 1.05 (95% CI, 1.02-1.08; I 2 =86.5%) for all-cause, cardiovascular disease (CVD), coronary heart disease (CHD), and cancer mortality, respectively. We found a nonlinear relationship between waist circumference and all-cause mortality among both women (p<0.001) and men (p=0.011). The summary RRs for a 0.1 unit in waist-to-hip ratio were 1.17 (95% CI, 1.12-1.21; I 2 =88.2%), 1.26 (95% CI, 1.17-1.34; I 2 =66.3%), 1.25 (95% CI, 1.10-1.40; I 2 =67.8%) and 1.13 (95% CI, 1.09-1.16; I 2 =0.0%) for all-cause, CVD, CHD, and cancer mortality, respectively. There was evidence of a nonlinear relationship between waist-to-hip ratio and all-cause mortality among women (p=0.016) rather than men (p=0.424). The dose-response relationship between central obesity and cause specific mortality were linear, except the association of waist circumference and CVD mortality (p=0.037), and waist-to-hip ratio and cancer mortality (p=0.039). Conclusions: Higher waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio measured continuously and categorically, increase the risk of all-cause mortality among men and women and are associated with increased risk of CVD, CHD and cancer mortality.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?