Abstract:In the producer–seller relationship, the seller, besides his role of selling, is often in an ideal position to gather useful market information for the producer’s operations planning. Incentive alignment is critical to motivate both information-acquisition and sales efforts. Two popular contract forms are investigated. One is the forecast-based contract (FC) that requires the seller to submit a demand forecast: the seller obtains commissions from the realized sales but is also obliged to pay a penalty for any deviation of the sales from the forecast. The other is the classical menu of linear contracts (MLC), from which the seller can choose a contract that specifies a unique commission rate and a fixed payment. The conventional understanding suggests that the MLC is superior, but it is often assumed that information is exogenously endowed. In contrast, we find that, with an endogenous information-acquisition effort, the MLC may suffer from a conflicted moral hazard effect that creates friction between motivations for the two efforts. The FC can, however, decouple these two tasks and thus dominate the MLC. We further find that when ensuring interim participation is necessary (e.g., renegotiation cannot be prevented after information acquisition), the performance of the FC might be affected by the adverse selection effect because it is unable to effectively separate different types, at which the MLC excels. We show that when the demand and supply mismatch cost is substantial, the conflicted moral hazard effect dominates the adverse selection effect, and the FC is more efficient, and it is the converse otherwise. These findings can enrich the understanding of these two contract forms and are useful for sales and operations planning. This paper was accepted by Yossi Aviv, operations management .

Optimal Contracts under Endogenous Demand Information Acquisition.

Demand Information and Spot Price Information: Supply Chains Trading in Spot Markets

Optimal Pricing Contracts and Level of Information Asymmetry in a Supply Chain

Contracting with asymmetric cost information in a dual-channel supply chain.

Supply Chain Contracting with Asymmetric Cost Information and Behavioral Preferences: Theory and Experiment

Incentive Provision for Demand Information Acquisition in a Dual-Channel Supply Chain

OPTIMAL CONTRACTS IN TWO-ECHELON SUPPLY CHAIN UNDER ASYMMETRIC INFORMATION AND NONLINEAR DEMAND

The Supply Chain Optimal Contract Design under Asymmetrical Information

Quantity discount design under the uncertain demand in supply chain

Observability of Retailer Demand Information Acquisition in a Dual-Channel Supply Chain.

Technical Note - Optimal Long-Term Supply Contracts with Asymmetric Demand Information

Learning by Consuming: Optimal Pricing with Endogenous Information Provision

Designing Supply Contracts: Contract Type and Information Asymmetry

Design for Supply Chain Contract with Asymmetric lnformation on Promotional Effort Cost

Optimal mechanism design with resale via bargaining

Provision of Incentives for Information Acquisition: Forecast-Based Contracts Vs. Menus of Linear Contracts

Auctioning Supply Contracts

Eliminate Demand Information Disadvantage in a Supplier Encroachment Supply Chain with Information Acquisition

Simple Contracts to Assure Supply under Noncontractible Capacity and Asymmetric Cost Information

Optimal procurement strategies by reverse auctions with stochastic demand

Supplier's Optimal Buy Back Decision under Asymmetric Information in a Two-Stage Supply Chain