When Open Borders Must Stay Open: Expectations and Freedom of Movement

Adam K. Webb

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/702557

2019-01-01

Polity

Abstract:Debates in political theory about national borders and free movement tend to focus on the abstract, static question of how much openness is ethically appropriate. In practice, however, any long-term realization of freer movement globally is likely to involve a dynamic patchwork of experiments that face setbacks from time to time. As Brexit revealed, a free movement zone can sometimes be broken up by a backlash to reclaim control of borders. In the world of policy and international law, there is some grudging respect for the acquired rights of individuals who have already moved across borders. But politicians and scholars fail to give enough weight to the expectation of many European Union citizens that the free movement zone would remain open to them. This article puts forth the view that a state's right to self-determination does not legitimately extend to closing borders, if openness has already been consolidated as an expectation and a social fact. It suggests that a proper account of cross-border social goods will chasten the undue deference given to the political sphere in curtailing openness. This argument has vital implications for migration policy in coming decades, offering normative clarity on why it would be improper to roll back free movement once achieved.