Abstract:The Universal Stanford Dependencies (USD) subordinates function words to content words. Auxiliaries, adpositions and subordinators are positioned as dependents of full verbs and nouns, respectively. Such an approach to the syntax of natural languages is contrary to most work in theoretical syntax in the past 35 years, regardless of whether this work is constituencyor dependency-based. A substantial amount of evidence delivers a strong argument for the more conventional approach, which subordinates full verbs to auxiliaries and nouns to adpositions. This contribution demonstrates that the traditional approach to the dependency status of auxiliary verbs is motivated by many empirical considerations, and hence USD cannot be viewed as modeling the syntax of natural languages in a plausible way. 1 The dependency status of function words The Universal Stanford Dependencies (USD), as presented in de Marneffe et al. (2014), advocates a scheme for parsing natural languages that categorically subordinates function words to content words. Auxiliary verbs, adpositions (prepositions and postpositions), subordinators (subordinate conjunctions), etc. are subordinated to the content words with which they co-occur. A more traditional dependency-based analysis assumes the opposite, i.e. most function words dominate the content words with which they co-occur. 1 The following diagrams illustrate both approaches: 1 Determiners are one area of disagreement among linguists. (1) waiting V(Aux)

The Status of Function Words in Dependency Grammar: A Critique of Universal Dependencies (UD)

The Dependency Status of Function Words: Auxiliaries.

A Historical Overview of the Status of Function Words in Dependency Grammar.

Semantic Roles or Syntactic Functions: the Effects of Annotation Scheme on the Results of Dependency Measures

Diagnostics for Constituents: Dependency, Constituency, and the Status of Function Words.

K-UD: Revising Korean Universal Dependencies Guidelines

Which Annotation Scheme is More Expedient to Measure Syntactic Difficulty and Cognitive Demand?

DDM at Work: Reply to comments on “Dependency distance: A new perspective on syntactic patterns in natural languages”

A Compositional Typed Semantics for Universal Dependencies

How Do Universal Dependencies Distinguish Language Groups?

Universal Dependencies for Uyghur.

Rediscovering Greenberg’s Word Order Universals in UD

On the Definition of Japanese Word

Coordination and Referential Dependencies: a Dependency Grammar Account in Terms of Predicate-Valent Structures

UCxn: Typologically Informed Annotation of Constructions Atop Universal Dependencies

How Universal is Genre in Universal Dependencies?

Treebanking User-Generated Content: a UD Based Overview of Guidelines, Corpora and Unified Recommendations

Dependency direction as a means of word-order typology: A method based on dependency treebanks

Dependency networks: A discussion note about Lamb’s theory of linguistic structure

Universal Dependencies for Learner English

Revisiting English Written VP-ellipsis and VP-substitution: a Dependency-Based Analysis