Abstract:The development of solid-state batteries has gained significant attention in recent years, owing to their potential to enhance the temperature range and energy density of energy storage devices. Sulfide-based electrolytes are some of the most promising candidates for solid-state batteries, thanks to their high ionic conductivity and low processing temperature. For lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries, the transition from liquid to solid electrolytes holds even greater promise. Sulfur is a readily available cathode material known for its high specific capacity, which endows Li-S batteries with remarkable specific energy and favourable environmental and economic impact. In liquid electrolytes however, the solubility of sulfur and lithium polysulfide causes a multitude of issues that hamper the performance of the Li-S system: rapid self-discharge, redox shuttle mechanism during charging, and loss of active sulfur and lithium material due to direct chemical reactivity. Solid-state Li-S cells are not prone to these issues, but they have, of course, issues of their own. Amongst them, the stability of the interface between the electrolyte and the lithium is of crucial importance to allow the use of this very high energy density negative electrode. In the present study, we compare two sulfide electrolytes, Li 6 PS 5 Cl and Li 7 P 3 S 11 , and assess their respective stability against lithium. We used innovative methods to characterize the interphase between the sulfide and the lithium without damaging it upon dismantling the cell. The nature and the properties of this interphase was characterised via EIS, XPS and ToF-SIMS. The EIS study showed that Li 6 PS 5 Cl forms a much more stable interphase with lithium than Li 7 P 3 S 11 , which is in accordance with most recent results in the literature. The XPS study confirmed the chemical composition of the interphase. Li 2 S and Li 3 P were present for both electrolytes. In the case of Li 6 PS 5 Cl, LiCl was also identified as expected. Gas cluster ion beam (GCIB) assisted abrasion of the interphase followed by in-situ XPS and ToF-SIMS suggested a separation of the components of the interphase depending on the depth of the abrasion. The interphase was found to be organised as Li 2 S-, Li 3 P- or LiCl-rich discrete layers, with the Li 2 S-rich layer being consistently the closest to lithium. This result confirms and completes the most recent research in the field published by Otto et al. in 2022 (doi: 10.1002/admi.202102387). To establish solid-state batteries as a practical energy storage option, it is essential to fully understand and effectively manage the Li-electrolyte interface. These findings suggest that thanks to the relative stability of its interface with lithium, Li 6 PS 5 Cl is the better option for solid-state lithium metal cells. It also sheds light on the reasons why this interface is more stable. The self-assembled lamellar structure of the interphase could also inspire strategies to better control the stability of solid electrolytes versus lithium.

Thermodynamic and Mechanical Stability of Crystalline Phases of Li2S2

Novel Metallic Crystalline Phase of Li2S3

Implication of Mechanical Properties of Li-S Binary Compounds Obtained from the First-Principles Study

Prediction of New Phase and Electrochemical Properties of Li2S2 for the Application of Li-S Batteries

Crystal Structures and Phase Stability of the Li$_2$S-P$_2$S$_5$ System from First Principles

Crystalline Sulfide Electrolytes For Li-S Batteries

Stable Lithium-Sulfur Batteries Ensured by GeS2 and -S8 Lattice Matching During the Charge Process

Phase Separation of Li2S/S at Nanoscale During Electrochemical Lithiation of the Solid‐State Lithium–Sulfur Battery Using in Situ TEM

Elaboration of Aggregated Polysulfide Phases: From Molecules to Large Clusters and Solid Phases

Sulfide-Based Solid-State Lithium-Sulfur Batteries: An in-Depth Study of the Li-Electrolyte Interface

Thermal Stability of Sulfide Solid Electrolyte with Lithium Metal

Examining Electrochemical and Mechanical Behavior of Amorphous and Crystalline Sulfide-Based Solid-State Electrolytes

Conformational Preference of Lithium Polysulfide Clusters Li2Sx (x = 4-8) in Lithium-Sulfur Batteries

Phase Equilibrium Thermodynamics of Lithium–sulfur Batteries

Adsorption of insoluble polysulfides Li2S(x) (x = 1, 2) on Li2S surfaces

Theoretically revealing the major liquid-to-solid phase conversion mechanism of the second plateau in lithium-sulfur batteries

Chemistry Design Towards a Stable Sulfide‐Based Superionic Conductor Li4Cu8Ge3S12

Revealing Charge Transport Mechanisms in Li2S2 for Li-Sulfur Batteries.

Stabilizing Li4SnS4 Electrolyte from Interface to Bulk Phase with a Gradient Lithium Iodide/Polymer Layer in Lithium Metal Batteries

The formation of crystalline lithium sulfide on electrocatalytic surfaces in lithium–sulfur batteries

Theoretical exploration of the structural evolution of sodium sulfide clusters in Na-S batteries