Abstract:How does revenue diversification shape the budgetary solvency of city governments? Previous studies informed by the public choice/fiscal illusion perspective suggest that diversification leads to unsustainable government expansion and budgetary imbalance. In contrast, the organizational adaptation/modern portfolio theory suggests that diversification enables government to prepare for external fiscal shocks. We use different measures of revenue diversification and rely on audited financial information to develop general fund‐based and government‐wide budgetary solvency measures for more than 500 midsized and large cities in the United States from 2006 to 2012. Addressing omitted variable bias, the results of the econometric analyses indicate that the type of diversification matters. Specifically, diversifying to non‐tax sources improves budgetary solvency as indicated by higher government‐wide operating ratio and reserves, whereas diversifying within the tax structure produces the opposite effects. The contradictory results point to the need to rethink current theories of diversification, which do not recognize the different ways that revenue structures can be broadened, and how these produce distinct effects on fiscal performance. We lay out the critical first step in clarifying and further developing a more nuanced theory by proposing three causal mechanisms outlining the pathways through which the types of diversification can influence budget outcomes. • This study examines the relationship between tax and non‐tax revenue diversification and government‐wide budgetary solvency (structural budget balance). It is the first in the revenue diversification literature to consider the total revenues and costs of operating government and incorporates a broader base of tax and non‐tax revenue sources including utilities. • The results suggest that increased reliance on non‐tax revenue sources, such as charges and fees, improves budgetary solvency. • In contrast, we find evidence that increased diversification of tax instruments leads to poor budget outcomes. • When financial managers and policymakers are considering adopting a new revenue source or expanding a current revenue stream, from a budgetary solvency standpoint, non‐tax sources may be advantageous. This study examines the relationship between tax and non‐tax revenue diversification and government‐wide budgetary solvency (structural budget balance). It is the first in the revenue diversification literature to consider the total revenues and costs of operating government and incorporates a broader base of tax and non‐tax revenue sources including utilities. The results suggest that increased reliance on non‐tax revenue sources, such as charges and fees, improves budgetary solvency. In contrast, we find evidence that increased diversification of tax instruments leads to poor budget outcomes. When financial managers and policymakers are considering adopting a new revenue source or expanding a current revenue stream, from a budgetary solvency standpoint, non‐tax sources may be advantageous.

The crowding-out effect within government funding: Implications for within-source diversification

Government Funding and Nonprofit Revenues in China: A Cross-Regional Comparison

Understanding the Effect of Central Government Funding on the Service and Advocacy Roles of Nonprofit Organizations in China: A Cross-Regional Comparison

How does government funding affect nonprofits' program spending? Evidence from international development organizations

Does Government Funding Make Nonprofits Administratively Inefficient? Revisiting the Link

Does Government Punish Nonprofits for High Administrative Costs in Contracting Decisions?

Providing Public Services Without Relying Heavily on Government Funding: How Do Nonprofits Respond to Government Budget Cuts?

An In-Depth Analysis of Government Funding and International Collaboration in Scientific Research

Government Expenditure and Nonprofit Sector Size: Testing Boundary Conditions for Theories of Government–Nonprofit Relationships with Evidence from Chinese Environmental NGOs

To Coerce or to Enable? The Effect of Government Funding on Policy Advocacy in Nonprofit Human Service Organizations

A Bibliometric Perspective on the Roles of Government Funding and International Collaboration in Scientific Research.

When Government Becomes the Principal Philanthropist: the Effects of Public Funding on Patterns of Nonprofit Governance

Revisiting the theory of revenue diversification: Insights from an empirical analysis of municipal budgetary solvency

Crowding in or crowding out? How local government debt influences corporate innovation for China

The Crowding-Out Effects Of Garbage Fees And Voluntary Source Separation Programs On Waste Reduction: Evidence From China

Peer effects in government R&D subsidies: evidence from the awareness-motivation-capability perspective

Government R&D Support and Firms’ Access to External Financing: Funding Effects, Certification Effects, or Both?

The more funding the better? The moderating role of knowledge stock on the effects of different government-funded research projects on firm innovation in Chinese cultural and creative industries

The crowding out effect of government debt on corporate financing: Firm-level evidence from China

Diversifying Funding Sources for Public Higher Education in China During Massification

Does Revenue Concentration Really Bring Organizational Efficiency? Evidence From Habitat for Humanity