A PAH growth mechanism and effect of alcohol addition on PAH formation in counterflow ethylene diffusion flames
Sungwoo Park,Yu Wang,Suk Ho Chung,S. Mani Sarathy
2015-01-01
Abstract:This study presents a chemical kinetic model for ethylene/alcohol flames with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) growth up to A7 (coronene, C24H12). In order to take into account recent kinetic investigations, the KAUST PAH sub-mechanism was merged with NUIG’s C0-C3 hydrocarbon sub-mechanism (i.e., AramcoMech 1.3) and the KAUST C1-C3 alcohol sub-mechanism. Toluene and ethylbenzene sub-chemistries were updated using the alkylaromatics mechanism 2.0. The present model was tested against fuel-rich ethylene premixed flames at atmospheric pressure. The model was also compared against counterflow ethylene/propane diffusion flames to capture the fuel blending effects on PAH concentrations. The model predicted well the synergistic effect of increased PAHs with increasing propane ratio, as well as the trend that larger PAH molecules are more pronounced than smaller ones. In this study, new experiments were conducted on ethylene counterflow diffusion flames with addition of C2-C3 alcohols. The experimental results indicate that alcohol addition leads to increasing soot production up to a global maximum followed by decreasing soot formation with increasing alcohol mixing. Overall, the computed maximum mole fractions of A7 (i.e., a proxy for soot) for these flames are in good agreement with the experimentally observed trend. Reaction path analysis was conducted to identify key reactions contributing to PAH formation, and better understand the effects of alcohol addition to ethylene counterflow diffusion flame structure. Introduction Soot and their precursors, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) have been studied extensively due to their adverse health and environmental effects [1]. Small hydrocarbon fuels (C1-C4) such as ethylene and propane have been studied in various flames to understand the formation of PAHs and soot. It is known that the formation and growth of PAHs are highly dependent on fuel molecular structure, and acetylene (C2H2) plays an important role in PAH growth via the sequential reactions of Habstraction-C2H2-addition (HACA) [2]. Odd numbered carbon species such as propargyl (C3H3), cyclopentadienyl (C5H5) and indenyl (C9H7) radicals have also been identified as contributors to PAH formation. Furthermore, propargyl radical recombination reaction is considered as one of the important reactions in benzene formation [3]. Several PAH mechanisms [4, 5] have been developed and PAH growth up to five-ring aromatic species have been simulated for C1-C2 fuels [5]. These chemical kinetic mechanisms have been tested under various flame configurations, but they are limited to relatively small PAHs with up to four or five aromatic rings and tested mainly for single component fuels. Synergistic effects on PAH and soot formation have been observed in ethylene/propane mixture fuels [6], and chemical cross-linking effects between binary component fuels led to a clear understanding about the underlying reaction channels. Chemical reaction mechanisms for multi-component or surrogate fuels have been typically limited to small aromatic species, ∗Corresponding author: sungwoo.park@kaust.edu.sa Proceedings of the European Combustion Meeting 2015 such as toluene and benzene. A mechanism for gasoline surrogate fuels (KM1) [7] was developed from the base mechanism [8] to account for the growth of PAHs up to coronene (A7, C24H12), and KM1 improved the prediction of PAH concentrations. A reaction mechanism for small hydrocarbon fuels (C1-C4) was extended to include the formation and growth of PAHs up to A7, and the mechanism (KM2) was in reasonable agreement with various experimental results [9]. A method of moments soot model was developed based on KM2 to simulate soot formation in ethylene-based counterflow diffusion flames and binary mixture with other fuels [10]; the soot model well captured the experimentally measured profiles of soot volume fraction, number density, and particle size of ethylene flames. McNesby and co-workers [11] conducted experiments in opposed flow ethylene/air diffusion flames to understand the effects of ethanol addition to either the fuel or the oxidizer streams. They found that ethanol addition to the oxidizer stream decreases soot primarily via a thermal mechanism, while addition to the fuel stream increases soot due to a chemical mechanism that increases the methyl radical concentrations. The purpose of the present study is to expand the experimental data available on alcohol addition to ethylene diffusion flames. C2 and C3 alcohols were added to better understand the effects of alcohol addition on PAH and soot formation. A comprehensive kinetic model for hydrocarbon and oxygenate fuels was developed to simulate and interrogate the experimentally observations. The chemical kinetic model is compared against various experimental data sets for validation. Experimental Methods In order to understand the influence of alcohol addition on ethylene diffusion flame, new experiments were conducted using counterflow diffusion flame configuration. The diameters of two opposed nozzles is 10 mm with an 8 mm separation distance. The average nozzle exit flow velocities for both the fuel and oxidizer streams were set at 15 cm/s. The oxidizer stream was composed of 27% O2 and 73% N2. The fuel stream was pure ethylene for the baseline case and ethanol or n-propanol vapor added to ethylene. To vaporize liquid fuels, the fuel supply line was heated to maintain the temperature at 180 ◦C and the temperature of fuel nozzle exit was maintained at 150 ◦C to prevent re-condensation of the pre-vaporized fuels. The temperature at the oxidizer nozzle was maintained at 25 ◦C. Laser-induced incandescence (LII) was used to measure the soot volume fraction. Kinetic Model Development The AramcoMech 1.3 high-temperature chemistry for the oxidation of small hydrocarbon and oxygenated (e.g., ethanol) species was utilized [12] as the base mechanism with additional reactions schemes for hydrocarbon oxidation up to benzene [13]. PAH growth reaction pathways up to coronene (A7) from KM1 [7] and KM2 [9] were then added. An n-propanol sub-mechanism [14] was added to simulate the effects of alcohol addition and toluene and ethylbenzene sub-chemistries were also updated using the Alkylaromatics mechanism 2.0 from Darcy et al. [13]. Additionally, PAH growth reactions initiated by propargyl (C3H3) radical addition to naphthalene (A2) leading to the formation of pyrene (A4) were added [15]. The proposed model includes 401 species and 2141 reactions. The present study follows the same notation for aromatic species with 1-7 rings (A1-A7) as [7]. Only a brief description of the proposed model is discussed herein, and readers are referred to [7, 9] for a more detailed description of PAH growth pathways. Several reactions with odd-carbon number species such as indenyl (C9H7), benzyl (C6H5CH2), cyclopentadienyl (C5H5) and propargyl(C3H3) radicals are included for PAH growth pathways along with the HACA mechanism. Most reactions for PAH growth beyond pyrene are based on the addition of acetylene (C2H2) to PAH radicals. The rate constants suggested by Kern et al. [16] are used for the decomposition of cyclopentadienyl radical to acetylene and propargyl radical. All the simulations were conducted in CHEMKIN PRO 15112 [17] using appropriate reactor modules. Results and Discussion The proposed model is first compared against fuelrich ethylene premixed flames (φ = 3.06) data at atmospheric pressure [18]. The premixed flame simulation was performed using the PREMIX module in CHEMKIN PRO [17] with the experimental temperature profile as 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 HAB [cm] 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 M ol e fr ac tio n [] C 2 H 4