Abstract:The current investigation focuses on detailed analysis of the anchor-based optimization approach (ABOA), its comparison with alternative global fitting protocols and on the global analysis of the truncation of basis effects in the calculation of binding energies. It is shown that ABOA provides a solution which is close to that obtained in alternative approaches but at small portion of their computational time. The application of a softer correction function after few initial iterations of ABOA stabilizes and speeds up its convergence. The numerical errors in the calculation of binding energies related to the truncation of bosonic and fermionic bases have been globally investigated with respect of asymptotic values corresponding to the infinite basis in the framework of covariant density functional theory (CDFT). These errors typically grow with the increase of the mass and deformation of the nuclei. To reduce such errors in bosonic sector below 10 keV for almost all nuclei with proton number Z<120 one should truncate the bosonic basis at NB=28 instead of presently used NB=20 . The reduction of the errors in binding energies due to the truncation of the fermionic basis in CDFT is significantly more numerically costly. For the first time it is shown that the pattern and the speed of the convergence of binding energies as a function of the size of fermionic basis given by NF depend on the type of covariant energy density functional. The use of explicit density dependence of the meson-nucleon coupling constants or point couplings slows substantially the speed of convergence of binding energies as a function of NF . The present paper clearly indicates the need for accounting of infinite basis corrections for accurate calculation of binding energies and for fitting more precise next-generation covariant energy density functionals: note that such corrections are neglected in the present generation of the functionals. A procedure for finding the asymptotic values of binding energies is suggested in the present paper: it allows better control of numerical errors. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.109.024321 ©2024 American Physical Society

An Effective Coulomb Interaction in Nuclear Energy Density Functionals

Nuclear Effective Charge Factor Originating from Covariant Density Functional Theory

Realistic evaluation of Coulomb potential in spherical nuclei and test of the traditional approach

Extended Skyrme Interactions for Nuclear Matter, Finite Nuclei, and Neutron Stars

Nuclear Dipole Polarizability from Mean-Field Modeling Constrained by Chiral Effective Field Theory

Constraints on Coulomb Energy, Neutron Skin Thickness in Pb208 , and Symmetry Energy

Treating Coulomb Exchange Contributions in Relativistic Mean Field Calculations: Why and How

Unified Nuclear Matter Equations of State Constrained by the In-Medium Balance in Density-Dependent Covariant Density Functionals

Beyond Wigner's Isobaric Multiplet Mass Equation: Effect of Charge-Symmetry-breaking Interaction and Coulomb Polarization

From Finite Nuclei to Neutron Stars: The Essential Role of High-Order Density Dependence in Effective Forces

Towards an ab initio covariant density functional for nuclear structure

Toward accurate nuclear mass tables in covariant density functional theory

The Effective Dbhf Method for Finite Nuclei

Extended Skyrme effective interactions with higher-order momentum-dependence for transport models and neutron stars

Slater Approximation for Coulomb Exchange Effects in Nuclear Covariant Density Functional Theory

A Survey of Coulomb Displacement Energies and Questions on the Anomalous Behavior in the Upper ${\sf Fp}$-Shell

Optimizing the relativistic energy density functional with nuclear ground state and collective excitation properties

Nuclear Matter Equation of State in the Brueckner-Hartree-Fock Approach and Standard Skyrme Energy-Density Functionals

Towards an ab initio covariant density functional theory for nuclear structure

Properties of Nuclear Matter in Relativistic Brueckner–Hartree–Fock Model with High-Precision Charge-Dependent Potentials

Relativistic Mean-Field Approach in Nuclear Systems