Hydrologic Implications of Vegetation Response to Elevated CO 2 in Climate Projections

Yuting Yang,Michael L. Roderick,Shulei Zhang,Tim R. McVicar,Randall J. Donohue
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0361-0
IF: 30.7
2018-01-01
Nature Climate Change
Abstract:Climate model projections using offline aridity and/or drought indices predict substantial terrestrial drying over the twenty-first century 1 – 11 . However, these same models also predict an increased runoff 12 – 15 . This contradiction has been linked to an absence of vegetation responses to an elevated atmospheric CO 2 concentration [CO 2 ] in offline impact models 12 , 14 , 16 , 17 . Here we report a close and consistent relationship between changes in surface resistance ( r s ) and [CO 2 ] across 16 CMIP5 models. Attributing evapotranspiration changes under non-water-limited conditions shows that an increase in evapotranspiration caused by a warming-induced vapour pressure deficit increase 18 is almost entirely offset by a decrease in evapotranspiration caused by increased r s driven by rising [CO 2 ]. This indicates that climate models do not actually project increased vegetation water use under an elevated [CO 2 ], which counters the perception that ‘warming leads to drying’ in many previous studies 1 – 11 . Moreover, we show that the hydrologic information in CMIP5 models can be satisfactorily recovered using an offline hydrologic model that incorporates the [CO 2 ] effect on r s in calculating potential evapotranspiration ( E P ). This offers an effective, physically-based yet relatively simple way to account for the vegetation response to elevated [CO 2 ] in offline impact models.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?