Abstract:Deep multi-view subspace clustering has achieved increasing attention owing to its encouraging ability to address the nonlinear multi-view data. Despite significant progress, most existing deep multi-view subspace clustering methods still suffer from the following drawbacks. First, they usually focus on utilizing the last-level feature from the last encoder layer of the auto-encoder related to each view, yet often overlook exploiting the earlier-level features from the earlier encoder layers as well as integrating the multi-level features from multiple encoder layers. Second, when learning the subspace representation from the self-expressive layer, they rarely consider the cleanliness and robustness of the learned subspace representation. To overcome these drawbacks, this paper proposes a novel clean and robust multi-level subspace representations learning for deep multi-view subspace clustering (CRMSRL). Specifically, the auto-encoder is adopted to nonlinearly map each view into the multi-level features, and then multiple self-expressive layers are added between the encoder layers and their corresponding decoder layers to provide multiple information flow paths through the auto-encoder and learn the multi-level subspace representations corresponding to the multi-level features. Consequently, the intricate hierarchical information embedded in the multi-level features is passed to the corresponding multi-level subspace representations. Moreover, with the idea of robust principal component analysis (RPCA), the learned multi-level subspace representations can be further purified to achieve the cleaner and more robust ones. In addition, to excavate the structural consistency among different views, the common layer is designed to interact with different view-specific self-expressive layers and achieve the high-quality common subspace representation, which can be applied to the spectral clustering algorithm to obtain the final clustering results. Experimental results show that CRMSRL outperforms twelve state-of-the-art baseline methods on six benchmark datasets. In particular, CRMSRL achieves 4.5% improvements on the MSRCV1 dataset in terms of accuracy, compared with the best baseline method.

Robust Multi-View Continuous Subspace Clustering

Robust Multi-View Subspace Clustering Based on Consensus Representation and Orthogonal Diversity

From Joint Feature Selection and Self-Representation Learning to Robust Multi-view Subspace Clustering.

Consistent and Complementary Graph Regularized Multi-view Subspace Clustering

Clean and Robust Multi-Level Subspace Representations Learning for Deep Multi-View Subspace Clustering

Robust Multi-View Low-Rank Embedding Clustering

Robust Multi-View Spectral Clustering Via Low-Rank and Sparse Decomposition

Consistent and Specific Multi-View Subspace Clustering

Exclusivity-Consistency Regularized Multi-view Subspace Clustering

Seeking commonness and inconsistencies: A jointly smoothed approach to multi-view subspace clustering

Multiple Kernel Low-Rank Representation-Based Robust Multi-View Subspace Clustering

Multiview Spectral Clustering Via Robust Subspace Segmentation

Confidence level auto-weighting robust multi-view subspace clustering

Multi-view Clustering Via Robust Consistent Graph Learning

Robust Low-Rank Kernel Multi-View Subspace Clustering Based on the Schatten P-Norm and Correntropy

Joint Robust Multi-view Spectral Clustering

Robust Auto-weighted Multi-view Subspace Clustering

Robust Multi-View Subspace Clustering Via Weighted Multi-Kernel Learning and Co-Regularization

Robust Subspace Clustering for Multi-View Data by Exploiting Correlation Consensus

Robust Multi-View Clustering with Noisy Correspondence

Robust Least Squares Regression for Subspace Clustering: A Multi-View Clustering Perspective