Late-Breaking: Efficacy Of L-Methionine In Comparison To Dl-Methionine In Cherry Valley Ducks

Y. Zhang,D. Ruan,W. Chen,S. Wang,W. Xia,C. Zheng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/sky404.565
2018-01-01
Journal of Animal Science
Abstract:The current research was to study the efficacy of L-methionine in comparison to DL-methionine in Cherry Valley ducks. A total of 1080 1-d-old Cherry Valley male ducks were allotted to nine groups with six replicate pens of 20 birds each according to a completely randomized design. Ducks were reared in coops (or on floor). The trials last 35 days and divided to two phases (0–14 d and 15–35 d). During the starter phase, ducks were fed a basal diet (Met, 0.30%) or supplemented with DL-Met or L-Met at 0.05%, 0.10%, 0.15%, or 0.2% of feed. During the growth phase, ducks were fed a basal diet (Met, 0.24%) or supplemented with DL-Met or L-Met at 0.04%, 0.08%, 0.12%, or 0.16% of feed. The results showed that dietary DL-Met or L-Met supplementation affected the growth performance of ducks in starter and whole phases(P < 0.05), both linearly and quadratically increased the body weight of ducks at 14 and 35 d of age, the average daily gain (ADG) of the starter and whole period, the feed intake and feed ratio during the starter phase (L < 0.05; Q < 0.05). No significant difference of carcass quality of ducks was found among groups, except the L-Met supplementation linearly and quadratically increased the leg ratio of eviscerated ducks (L < 0.001; Q < 0.001). Dietary DL-Met or L-Met supplementation linearly and quadratically increased the score of back feather of ducks at 35 d of age (L < 0.05;Q < 0.05). Besides, compared with DL-Met, the efficacy of L-Met was 110.8% (ADG in starter phase, R2=0.79) and 127.8% (feed ratio in starter phase, R2=0.79). Overall, dietary L-Met supplementation can affect the growth performance of ducks, especially at the starter phase, and the efficacy in ADG and feed ratio were 110.8% and 127.8% respectively.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?