Abstract:Three strictly comparable cross-section household dataset,related to 1988,1995 and 2001,are used to analyze the rapid yet unequal growth of wage and the sharp widening of wage structure.Earnings functions are compared and the increase in both the level and the inequality of wages are decomposed into their constituent elements.Distinctions are made between the variables likely to represent human capital,discrimination,and segmentation.The evidence suggests that productive characteristics were increasingly rewarded as marketization The Gini coefficient of earnings rose by 10.7 percentage points in the first phase from 1988 to 1995.Whereas the mean wage increased by 67 percent,the pay of the 10th percentile rose by only 22 percent,and that of the 90th percentile rose by 97 percent.These changes are much larger than those of the second phase from 1995 to 2001.Moreover,the returns to education rose sharply,as did the returns to occupation-specific skills.The initially slight inverse-U shape of the age-earnings profile became more pronounced: a change consistent with human capital theory.Thus the productive characteristics of workers were increasingly rewarded in the labor market.However,there were also signs of greater wage discrimination against women.Moreover,the market forces operating in the growing private sector and the relative immunity of the state sector from those forces generated greater wage segmentation among types of ownership,and provincial differences in the pace of reform and in economic growth created spatial segmentation in wages that could not be removed by the equilibrating movement of labor.Decomposition analyses were conducted in order to examine the contribution of particular characteristics to the rise in the Gini coefficient.Only a third of earnings inequality and its increase could be explained: the unobserved determinants are clearly important to the increase in earnings dispersion.The discrimination variables accounted for only a small part of the increase.The segmentation variables made the most important contribution,and that was mainly due to growing wage dispersion among provinces.This result is supported by other evidence of powerful divergence in mean earnings among provinces(Knight,Li and Zhao,2001).Some but not all components of human capital were disequalizing.These particular changes are likely to represent the stirring of labor market forces.

ACCOUNTING FOR URBAN CHINA'S RISING INCOME INEQUALITY: THE ROLES OF LABOR MARKET, HUMAN CAPITAL, AND MARRIAGE MARKET FACTORS

Decomposition Analysis on Income Inequality in Urban China

China's Unbalanced Economic Growth and National Income Distribution

Marketization and Unequal Growth of Wage: Their Extent and Influence Factors

Rising Wage Inequality:Composition Effect and Price Effect

Income and Consumption Inequality in Urban China: 1992–2003

Accounting for Changes in Income Inequality in China, 2002-2018: Evidence from Household Survey Data

The Anatomy of Rising Earnings Inequality in Urban China

Empirical Analysis of the Determinants for Increasing Income Inequality in Urban China

THE URBAN?RURAL INCOME GAP AND INEQUALITY IN CHINA

The Urban-Rural Income Gap and Income Inequality in China

The Structural Changes in the Labor Market and the Wage Inequality in Urban China between 1989 and 2009

Decomposition of the Increase in Earnings Inequality in Urban China: A Distributional Approach

Short-term Trends in China’s Income Inequality and Poverty: Evidence from a Longitudinal Household Survey

The Causes of Income Inequality in Urban China: A Household Assets Perspective

Relative earnings of husbands and wives in urban China

Household Income and Wealth Inequality in Urban China: 1995-2002

Women's Employment and Family Income Inequality during China's Economic Transition

Market Transition and Income Inequality in Urban China: Evidence from Shapley Value Decomposition

Rising Gender Income Gap and Its Dynamics in China:Market competition or sex discrimination?

Rising inequality in China : challenges to a harmonious society