Strong Preference of the Redox-Neutral Mechanism over the Redox Mechanism for the TiIV Catalysis Involved in the Carboamination of Alkyne with Alkene and Diazene.
Jiandong Guo,Yu Lu,Ruihua Zhao,Zheyuan Liu,Wasihun Menberu,Zhi-Xiang Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201800339
2018-01-01
Chemistry
Abstract:Titanium catalysis generally prefers redox-neutral mechanisms. Yet it has been reported that titanium could promote bond formations in a way similar to reductive elimination. Accordingly, redox catalytic cycles involving Ti-IV/Ti-II cycling have been considered. By studying, as an example, the carboamination of alkynes with alkenes and azobenzene catalyzed by the [Ti-IV]=NPh imido complex, we performed DFT computations to gain an understanding of how the abnormal catalysis takes place, thereby allowing us to clarify whether the catalysis really follows Ti-IV/Ti-II redox mechanisms. The reaction first forms an azatitanacyclohexene by alkyne addition to the [Ti-IV]=NPh bond, followed by alkene insertion. The azatitanacyclohexene can either undergo C-alpha-C-gamma coupling, to afford bicyclo[3.1.0]imine, or beta-H elimination, to yield a [Ti-IV]-H hydride, which then undergoes C-alpha=C-beta or C-gamma=C-delta insertion to give an alpha,beta- or beta,gamma-unsaturated imine, respectively. Both the geometric and electronic structures indicate that the catalytic cycles proceed through redox-neutral mechanisms. The alternative redox mechanisms (e.g., by N-H or C-H reductive elimination) are substantially less favorable. We concluded that electronically, the Ti-IV catalysis intrinsically favors the redox-neutral mechanism, because a redox pathway would involve Ti-II structures either in the triplet ground state or in the high-lying open-shell singlet state, but the involvement of triplet Ti-II structures is spin-forbidden and that of singlet Ti-II structures is energetically disadvantageous.