Abstract:Abstract Background Ontologies house various kinds of domain knowledge in formal structures, primarily in the form of concepts and the associative relationships between them. Ontologies have become integral components of many health information processing environments. Hence, quality assurance of the conceptual content of any ontology is critical. Relationships are foundational to the definition of concepts. Missing relationship errors (i.e., unintended omissions of important definitional relationships) can have a deleterious effect on the quality of an ontology. An abstraction network is a structure that overlays an ontology and provides an alternate, summarization view of its contents. One kind of abstraction network is called an area taxonomy , and a variation of it is called a subtaxonomy . A methodology based on these taxonomies for more readily finding missing relationship errors is explored. Methods The area taxonomy and the subtaxonomy are deployed to help reveal concepts that have a high likelihood of exhibiting missing relationship errors. A specific top-level grouping unit found within the area taxonomy and subtaxonomy, when deemed to be anomalous, is used as an indicator that missing relationship errors are likely to be found among certain concepts. Two hypotheses pertaining to the effectiveness of our Quality Assurance approach are studied. Results Our Quality Assurance methodology was applied to the Biological Process hierarchy of the National Cancer Institute thesaurus (NCIt) and SNOMED CT’s Eye/vision finding subhierarchy within its Clinical finding hierarchy. Many missing relationship errors were discovered and confirmed in our analysis. For both test-bed hierarchies, our Quality Assurance methodology yielded a statistically significantly higher number of concepts with missing relationship errors in comparison to a control sample of concepts. Two hypotheses are confirmed by these findings. Conclusions Quality assurance is a critical part of an ontology’s lifecycle, and automated or semi-automated tools for supporting this process are invaluable. We introduced a Quality Assurance methodology targeted at missing relationship errors. Its successful application to the NCIt’s Biological Process hierarchy and SNOMED CT’s Eye/vision finding subhierarchy indicates that it can be a useful addition to the arsenal of tools available to ontology maintenance personnel.

Tracking Logical Difference in Large-Scale Ontologies: A Forgetting-Based Approach

Tracking Logical Difference in Industrial-Scale Ontologies.

Tracking Semantic Evolutionary Changes in Large-Scale Ontological Knowledge Bases

Highly-Optimized Forgetting for Creating Signature-Based Views of Ontologies

Ontology Matching Based On Probabilistic Description Logic

A Comparative Study on Three Ontology Mapping Methods in the Integration of Product Knowledge

Using Finite-State Models for Log Differencing

Computing Views of OWL Ontologies for the Semantic Web

Supplementary Material: Quasi-Dense Similarity Learning for Multiple Object Tracking

Concept Forgetting in ALCOI -Ontologies Using an Ackermann Approach.

UI-FAME: A High-Performance Forgetting System for Creating Views of Ontologies.

A Practical Approach to Forgetting in Description Logics with Nominals.

Efficient Computation of Signature-Restricted Views for Semantic Web Ontologies

Tracking Changes for Inter-Version Interoperability in Heterogeneous Evolving Medical Terminologies

Creating Signature-Based Views for Description Logic Ontologies with Transitivity and Qualified Number Restrictions

Approximation Analysis of Ontology Learning Algorithm in Linear Combination Setting

Missing lateral relationships in top-level concepts of an ontology

Matching Large Ontologies: A Divide-and-conquer Approach

Role Forgetting for ALCOQH(universal Role)-Ontologies Using an Ackermann-Based Approach.

Reversing the Forget-Retain Objectives: An Efficient LLM Unlearning Framework from Logit Difference

Forgetting Concept and Role Symbols in ALCOIH\mu+(\top, \Sqcap)-Ontologies.