NCMP-32. OUTCOMES AND PREDICTIVE FACTORS OF RECRANIOTOMY FOR SEVERE COMPLICATIONS FOLLOWING SELECTIVE CRANIOTOMY FOR INTRACRANIAL TUMORS

Yong Liu,Yan Qu,Qiang Meng,Yang Sun,Bei Liu,Xue Jiang,Hua Zhang,Guodong Gao,Liang Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noy148.831
2018-01-01
Neuro-Oncology
Abstract:The outcomes of recraniotomies for severe complications following selective craniotomies for intracranial tumors were rarely reported by far. Hence, the objective of this study was to analyze the outcomes and predictive factors of unscheduled recraniotomies. Patients undergoing recraniotomies for complications after selective craniotomies for intracranial tumors from Jan 2014 to Dec 2017 were collected. Primary outcome was KPS (Karnofsky Performance Status) score at discharge. Patients were divided into three groups according to this KPS score: good KPS group with KPS≥70, poor KPS group with KPS≤10, and others were moderate KPS group. Predictive factors included demographics, imaging findings and characteristics of two craniotomies. There were 109 patients included with 39 patients in good KPS group, 39 in moderate KPS group, and 31 in poor KPS group. The rate of poor KPS outcome was 28.4%. Univariate and multivariate regression analysis showed tumor diameter (odds ratio 0.589, P=0.016), reoperative blood loss (odds ratio 0.001, P=0.021), and time interval between two craniotomies (odds ratio 13.680, P=0.000) were positively associated with poor KPS. In contrast, GCS score before recraniotomies (odds ratio -0.713, P=0.004) were positively associated with good KPS. CONCLUSIONS: The major outcome of recraniotomies was good and moderate KPS at discharge. Tumor diameter, reoperative blood loss, and time interval between two craniotomies were positive predictive factors for poor KPS outcome. GCS score before recraniotomies was positive factors for good KPS outcome.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?