A7958 Prevalence and clinical characteristics of patients with treatment resistant hypertension by region: the spirit study

Cheryl Carcel,Bruce Neal,Suzanne Oparil,Krzysztof Narkiewicz,Jiguang Wang,Ernesto Schiffrin,Michel Azizi,Neil Poulter,John Chalmers
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hjh.0000549252.23988.4b
IF: 4.9
2018-01-01
Journal of Hypertension
Abstract:Objectives: We quantified the characteristics of patients with treatment resistant hypertension (TRH) in a large multi-country sample of specialist tertiary centres and estimated incidence and prevalence in participating regions. Methods: The Survey of Patients with treatment Resistant hyperTension (SPIRIT) study was a retrospective review of medical records of patients seen at tertiary centres located in Western Europe, Eastern Europe, North America, South America, Australia and Asia. Data on demographics, medical history and medication use were extracted from medical records. Prevalence and incidence of TRH were estimated based upon reported catchment populations. Results: 1555 patients from 76 centres in 15 countries were included from May-August 2017. Mean age was 64 (SD, 12.7), 60% were males and 62% were Caucasian, 36% had CKD (eGFR < 60 ml/min), 41% had diabetes, 12% were smokers and 27% had a previous CV event. Daytime ambulatory BP was the most frequently used measurement (46%) with a mean systolic BP of 144 mmHg (SD, 19.2) and diastolic BP 81 mmHg (SD, 13.8). 95% patients were prescribed diuretics (thiazides 75%), 93% an inhibitor of the renin-angiotensin aldosterone system, 86% a calcium antagonist, 75% a beta-blocker and 35% an aldosterone antagonist. There were moderate differences in participant characteristics and management patterns between regions. The overall estimated mean incidence of TRH was 5.8 per 100,000 per year (ranging between 2.3 and 14.0 across regions) and the corresponding estimated mean prevalence of TRH was 23.9 per 100,000, ranging between 7.6 and 90.5 across regions. Conclusion: Observed variation between regions likely reflects some real differences in patient characteristics and physician management practices, but may also be due to inconsistent patient recruitment methods.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?