P2.01-109 Treatment Duration—A More Reasonable Definition to Evaluate the Efficacy of Crizotinib in ALK Positive Advanced NSCLC

G. Yang,D. Ma,J. Li,P. Xing,X. Hao,H. Xu,Y. Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2018.08.1164
IF: 20.121
2018-01-01
Journal of Thoracic Oncology
Abstract:Crizotinib has demonstrated its superior efficacy in ALK positive NSCLC patients when used as first-line regimen, with a median overall survival (OS) of more than 4 years, whereas a median progression-free survival (PFS) of only 10.9 months. Patients who continued crizotinib beyond progressive disease (CBPD) could still obtain additional survival benefits of 6-8 months after disease progression. In terms of that, PFS, the frequently used primary endpoint in clinical trials, may not be able to provide accurate information on impact of this intervention in multiple lines therapy. Here we proposed “treatment duration” as an intermediate clinical endpoint between PFS and OS that further define efficacy of crizotinib in multiple lines of treatment and reported the exploratory data in a real-world cohort. We retrospectively enrolled 150 ALK positive NSCLC patients who had acquired crizotinib resistance from Aug 2011 to May 2017. The median PFS of crizotinib and median OS (from crizotinib initiation) were analyzed. Treatment duration of crizotinib, the time from crizotinib initiation to discontinuation, was also calculated. The median PFS of crizotinib in the 150 ALK positive advanced NSCLC patients was 14.4 months (95% CI: 11.3-17.4). Overall, 58 patients (38%) continued CBPD and the median post-progression PFS was 10.4 months, resulting in a median treatment duration of crizotinib in the total cohort of 20.2 months (95% CI: 14.3-26.0). And median OS was 30.1months (95% CI: 21.3-38.8). 77 (51%) patients who received crizotinib as first-line therapy exhibited both longer median PFS (17.7 months, 95% CI: 12.5-22.9; vs. 12.2months, 95% CI: 7.6-16.8) and median OS (35.2 months, 95% CI: 23.2-47.1; vs. 25.4 months, 95% CI: 14.4-36.3) compared to those selected crizotinib as second- line and above therapy. The treatment duration among them were 23.1 months (95% CI: 14.7-31.4) and 18.9 months (95% CI: 11.4-26.3), respectively. Crizotinib showed superior efficacy in ALK positive NSCLC patients. Treatment duration may be more reasonable to define the efficacy of crizotinib in multiple lines therapy of ALK positive NSCLC.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?