Optimal Virtual Monochromatic Image in “Twin-Beam” Imaging of Dual-Energy CT for Head-and-Neck Cancer Radiation Therapy

X. Yang,T. Wang,B. Ghavidel,J. J. Beitler,X. Tang,W. J. Curran,T. Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.06.267
2018-01-01
Abstract:Monochromatic images synthesized from dual-energy CT (DECT) data have the potential to reduce beam-hardening artifacts and to provide quantitative measurements. The “twin-beam” imaging scheme in DECT is to simultaneously capture two CT images with different energy spectra, which can eliminate patient motion problem between two CT images. The purpose of this study is to investigate the new “twin-beam” imaging scheme of DECT in head-and-neck radiotherapy workflow and choose optimal monochromatic image for organ-at-risk (OAR) delineation in treatment planning. We synthesized monochromatic images at various energies from “twin-beam” DECT images. Specifically, we generated monochromatic images 40 keV to 190 keV at 5keV increment, and totally obtained 30 monochromatic images for each DECT image. We collected the Hounsfield unit (HU) numbers of OARs (brain stem, mandible, spinal cord and parotid glands), the HU numbers of marginal regions outside OARs and the noise levels for each monochromatic image. We then calculated the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) for the different OARs at each energy level to generate a serial of spectral curves for each OAR. Based on these spectral curves of CNR, the mono-energy corresponding to the curve peak (max CNR) was identified for each OAR of each patient. The virtual images at these identified mono-energy are the optimal monochromatic images for the delineations of corresponding OARs. Ten head-and-neck cancer patients scanned with the “twin-beam” imaging scheme were used to test the optimal monochromatic image for the delineation of OARs. Based on the maximized CNR, the optimal energy values were 81.86±2.58 keV for brain stem, 75.63±4.96 keV for mandible, 85.00±4.63 keV for spinal cord, and 83.13±2.59 keV for parotid glands. Overall, the optimal energy value for the delineation of these OARs for head-and-neck cancer patients was 81.41±5.12 keV. We have investigated this new “twin-beam” imaging scheme of DECT in head-and-neck radiotherapy workflow and demonstrated its clinical feasibility of choosing optimal virtual monochromatic images for improving OAR delineation in the head-and-neck radiotherapy planning. This could help us enable a stepwise clinical implementation of optimized “twin-beam” protocol for head-and-neck cancer patients, and has the potential to improve head-and-neck radiotherapy.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?