Abstract:Crowdsourcing offers a new way for mobilizing the collective intelligence and efforts of a large group of people to tackle tasks which cannot be efficiently performed by machines (e.g., video transcription, monitoring road conditions at specific locations) (Doan, Ramakrishnan, and Halevy 2011). Many commercial crowdsourcing platforms are now available. Their business depends on providing satisfactory services to both the crowdsourcers (i.e. task requesters) and the workers involved. From the crowdsourcers' perspective, they expect to receive high quality results for their crowd sourcing tasks in a timely manner. From the workers' perspective, they want to earn as much as possible while committing limited productive effort.As the crowdsourcers are the main source of revenue for crowdsourcing platforms, their requirements tend to take precedence over those of the workers. Many commercial crowdsourcing platforms have implemented some variants of reputation-based mechanisms (Yu et al. 2013a) to gauge the workers' competence based on their past performance, and allow only those with good reputations to access tasks.While this simple reputation-based task delegation method is intuitive and has its own merits, a different, albeit related problem, has not received much attention. As crowd sourcing workers are human beings, they have limited availability and productive capacities to work on tasks delegated to them (Yu et al. 2012). Concentrating requests to workers with good reputations may result in details. In addition, as a small portion of reputable workers become overloaded with task requests while others remain relatively idle, attrition may occur in the worker population, thereby leaving the crowdsourcing platform with a shortage of workers.The potentially conflicting objectives between crowdsourcers and workers can be formalized under the congestion game framework (Monderer and Shapley 1996). In congestion games, the payoff for each player depends on the resources it selects and the number of other players selecting the same resources. For instance, the morning commute to work places by many people can be modeled as a congestion game. The time taken by a traveller on a given day depends on how many others are taking the same route as him.

A Method of Accurately Accepting Tasks for New Workers Incorporating with Capacities and Competition Intensities

Task Assignment with Guaranteed Quality for Crowdsourcing Platforms.

A Model of New Workers' Accurate Acceptance of Tasks Using Capable Sensing.

A Capacity Aware-Based Method of Accurately Accepting Tasks for New Workers.

Research on the Optimal Combination and Scheduling Method of Crowdsourcing Members in a Cloud Design Platform

Crowdsourcing with Self-paced Workers

Infusing Human Factors Into Algorithmic Crowdsourcing

Spatial Crowdsourcing Task Assignment Based On The Quality Of Workers

Task Assignment for Social-Oriented Crowdsourcing.

Table 2 : Satisfaction between Tasks and Workers in Example

Icrowd: An Adaptive Crowdsourcing Framework

Treating Crowdsourcing as Examination: How to Score Tasks and Online Workers?

Enabling Uneven Task Difficulty in Micro-Task Crowdsourcing

Efficient Cross Dynamic Task Assignment in Spatial Crowdsourcing.

An Efficient Task Allocation Scheme with Capability Diversity in Crowdsensing

Quality Control of Crowdsourcing through Workers Expe- rience

Task Pricing Optimization Model of Crowdsourcing Platform

Crowdota: An Online Task Assignment System In Crowdsourcing

Profit Maximization in Mobile Crowdsourcing: A Competitive Analysis

Batch Allocation for Tasks with Overlapping Skill Requirements in Crowdsourcing.

Quality-Assured Synchronized Task Assignment in Crowdsourcing