Abstract:Earlier research studies on public-private partnership (PPP) indicated that an objective, reliable, and practical risk assessment model for PPP projects and an equitable risk allocation mechanism among different parties are crucial to the successful implementation of these PPP projects. However, actual empirical research works in this research area are limited. This paper reports the first stage of a research study, which aims to identify and assess the principal risks for the delivery of PPP projects in China and to address their proper risk allocation between the private and public sectors. An empirical questionnaire survey was designed to examine the relative importance of different risk factors and to analyze the allocation of risk factors to different parties in PPP projects. A total of 580 questionnaires were sent out, and a total of 105 valid responses were obtained for data analysis. The Mann-Whitney U test is employed to investigate whether significant difference in perception existed first between the private and public sectors and second between industrial practitioners and academics in China. The empirical findings show that the three most important risk factors for PPP projects in China are (1) government intervention; (2) government corruption; and (3) poor public decision-making processes. These findings reveal that the Chinese government intervention and corruption may be the major obstacles to the success of PPP projects in China. A major cause for these risks may be attributed to inefficient legislative and supervisory systems for PPP projects in China. After conducting the Mann-Whitney U test on the 105 survey respondents, the empirical findings indicate that the perceptions of all 34 risk factors in China between the private and public sectors were not significantly different. Similarly, there were no significant differences between academics and industrial practitioners except that the former perceived the problem of government corruption to be more severe than did the latter. For risk allocation, the empirical results indicate that the public and private sectors were in general consensus with most of the risks identified. The major risks that the public sector preferred to accept are within the systematic risk category, especially political, legal, and social risks. The private sector preferred to retain the principal risks within the specific project risk category, especially construction, operation, and relationship risks, in addition to economic risks within systematic risk category. The remaining risk, environment risk, is preferred to be shared between the two sectors. This research study enables international construction companies to better understand how risks should be assessed and allocated for PPP projects in China. It also assists in risk response planning and control for future PPP projects in China. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000049. (C) 2011 American Society of Civil Engineers.

Identification and Allocation of Risks Associated with Ppp Water Projects in China / Su Kinijos Vandens Projektais, Pagrįstais Viešojo Ir Privačiojo Sektorių Partneryste, Susijusių Rizikos Rūšių Nustatymas Ir Paskirstymas

Cross-Sectional Analysis of Critical Risk Factors for PPP Water Projects in China

Empirical Study of Risk Assessment and Allocation of Public-Private Partnership Projects in China

Understanding the Risks in China'S Ppp Projects: Ranking of Their Probability and Consequence

Using Bargaining Game Theory For Risk Allocation Of Public-Private Partnership Projects: Insights From Different Alternating Offer Sequences Of Participants

Equitable Risk Allocation In Chinese Ppp Power Projects

Equitable Risk Allocation In Chinese Public-Private Partnership Power Projects

Risk Allocation in Infrastructure Public-Private Partnership(PPP) Projects

Equitable Risks Allocation of Projects Inside China: Analyses from Delphi Survey Studies

Preferred Risk Allocation in China’s Public–private Partnership (PPP) Projects

Risk Allocation in Public-Private Partnership Infrastructure Projects: Comparative Study

Institutional Environment, Institutional Arrangements, and Risk Identification and Allocation in Public–Private Partnerships: A Multilevel Model Analysis Based on Data from 31 Provinces in China

RISK MANAGEMENT PRACTICE IN CHINA'S PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP PROJECTS

Risk Evaluation of Water Environmental Treatment PPP Projects Based on the Intuitionistic Fuzzy MULTIMOORA Improved FMEA Method

Risk assessment and classification prediction for water environment treatment PPP projects

Analysis on Critical Risk Factors Causing the Failures of China's PPP Projects

Critical risk management strategies for the operation of public–private partnerships: a vulnerability perspective of infrastructure projects

Risk Allocation Principles and a Framework for Risk Allocation of PPP

How Did Balance Loss Occur? A Cross-stakeholder Analysis of Risk Misallocation in a Sponge City PPP Project

Temporal and Spatial Evolution of Public–Private Partnership (PPP) Project Risks in China: 2003–2019

Analysis of Political Risks and Opportunities in Public Private Partnerships (PPP) in China and Selected Asian Countries