Abstract:In social economic decisions, people not only care about their own payoffs but also the payoffs of others, a tendency termed altruistic preference. Numerous studies have shown that the sheer sense of being observed is sufficient to augment subjects' altruistic choices. However, whether subjects' altruistic behavior can be modulated by other stake-holders in the decision context remains unclear. In this study, we provide experimental evidence about the effects of visibility from receivers and social norms on the altruistic preference of the deciders in two studies. First, we confirmed the visibility effect originating from receivers on deciders' altruistic preference in Study 1. In Study 2, we further showed that social norms modulated the effect of behavior visibility on deciders' altruistic preference, suggesting a potential avenue via which social norms influence the relationship between behavioral visibility and altruistic preference. Study 1 implemented a 2 ( visibility: visible vs. invisible) x 2 (reaction type: choice vs. rating) x 2 (inequity aversion: AIA vs. DIA) within-subject design. We recruited 38 participants and they were required to either choose from two reward allocation options (choice task) with another partner, or rate how satisfied concerning a particular allocation (rating task) in a dictator game (DG). Participants' behavior was either observed by their "partners" (visible condition) or remained private (invisible condition). We provided both model-free and model-based evidence for the effects of visibility on altruistic preference. Compared to the invisible condition, participants exhibited greater altruistic preference when their behavior were visible to the receivers (partners). This tendency was significant across both choice and rating tasks. In addition, participants cared more about allocation efficiency in the choice task than in the rating task. Finally, visibility alleviated the behavioral discrepancies between the rating and choice tasks, indicating that social preference and choice strategies tend to converge in the visible condition. Study 2 implemented a 2 (visibility: visible vs. invisible) x 2 ( social norm: altruistic vs. non-altruistic) within- subject design. 53 participants took part in the study with altruistic or non-altruistic social norms. Different social norms were manipulated by presenting the proportions of choosing the unfair options from previous participants: In the altruistic social norm condition, most previous participants chose the option that maximizes others' relative payoffs, while in the non- altruistic condition it was the opposite. Our results showed that in the altruistic social norm condition, visibility significantly increased participants' altruistic preference. However, such effect diminished in the non-altruistic social norm condition. Our study revealed that deciders' behavioral visibility to receivers increased altruistic preference and promoted altruistic behavior. Furthermore, the altruistic social norm played a modulatory role on the visibility effect, supporting the signaling hypothesis of altruistic preference.

Benevolence–dependability value and intertemporal choice: Moderating effect of perceived socioeconomic status

Advantageous Inequity Aversion Does Not Always Exist: the Role of Determining Allocations Modulates Preferences for Advantageous Inequity

Socio-economic status moderates the relationship between values and subjective well-being among Chinese college students

Adapting to the Destitute Situations: Poverty Cues Lead to Short-Term Choice.

Effect of Socioeconomic Status on Altruistic Behavior in Chinese Middle School Students: Mediating Role of Empathy

Social Norm Modulates the Enhancement Effect of Behavioral Visibility on Altruistic Preference

Can You Change My Generosity Towards Future Others? the Impact of Observability on Intertemporal Pro‐social Decisions

Community Identity As a Mediator of the Relationship Between Socioeconomic Status and Altruistic Behaviour in Chinese Residents

Justifying Decisions Making Choices for Others Enhances Preferences for Impoverished Options

Dependency-Oriented Versus Autonomy-Oriented Help: Inferred Motivations and Intergroup Perceptions

Effects on Status Striving: How Self-Perceived Value, Self-Esteem, and Personality Traits Impact Preferred Status

Influence of Self-Relevance and Reputational Concerns on Altruistic Moral Decision Making

Age differences of responders' decision-making in disadvantageous and advantageous inequality contexts in the ultimatum game: The role of social value orientation

Does subjective socioeconomic status moderate the effect of basic psychological need satisfaction on undergraduates' affective forecasting?

The impact of family socioeconomic status on prosocial behavior: a survey of college students in China

Cooperating with Different Types of Strangers: The Influence of Guanxi Perception, Trust, and Responsibility

Higher Status Honesty Is Worth More: The Effect of Social Status on Honesty Evaluation

Reaching the limits of reciprocity in favor exchange: The effects of generous, stingy, and matched favor giving on social status.

The Impact of Consumers’ Choice Deferral Behavior on Their Intertemporal Choice Preference

Longitudinal Relations Between Perceived Economic Inequality and Prosocial Behavior among Chinese Adolescents: the Mediating Role of System Justification

The Influence of the Perceived Status Change on Status Consumption