Abstract:This paper adopts minutely high-frequency data of yields,volumes and open interests of the six commodities futures in three exchanges of China to probe into their intraday change patterns,and discovers the `L' pattern intraday movement of absolute yield and volume.We exert financial market microstructure theory,traders' psychology and trading mechanism to explain the different intraday phenomenon between the futures market and the stock market,which has a distinctive `U' pattern.Basing on this,by the help of Granger causality test theories and Vector Autoregressive models(VAR),we study the factors that influence the volatility of yields and the lagged orders.The results show that there are two-way Granger causality among each two of the absolute yield,volume and open interest, which is different from the empirical result of the stock market that there is a one-way Granger causality from volume to absolute yield,and the difference comes from the short mechanism of futures market.Through the decomposition of variance of VAR models and the impulse response analysis,we empirically analyze the dynamic relationship among the three factors.The conclusion shows that: when we treat the volatility of absolute yield as an explained variable,the residual disturbance can be explained about 90% by its lagged terms,and volume can explain about 10%.When volume is interpreted as an explained variable,about 80% of the residual disturbance can be explained by its lagged terms and the volatility of the absolute price explains about 20%.When open interest is considered as an explained variable,lagged terms of its own interprets about 45% to 70% of the residual disturbance,the volume explains 25%-45%,and the volatility of absolute price explains 5% to 10%.All the explanatory variables reach stable about 20-30 minutes later.Empirical result tells the weak impact from open interest to volatility of absolute yield and volume and the strong correlation between volatility of absolute yield and volume.Some investment suggestions are offered from the analysis mentioned above.

Capital Markets and Grain Prices: Assessing the Storage Cost Approach

Capital Markets in China and Britain, 1770–1860: Evidence from Grain Prices

A Model for Predicting and Grading the Quality of Grain Storage Processes Affected by Microorganisms under Different Environments.

A simple model of endogenous agricultural commodity price fluctuations with storage

Understanding the non-convergence of agricultural futures via stochastic storage costs and timing options

An investigation of the price discovery role of futures markets: A dynamic time warping analysis of the United States corn markets

Interest Rate Dynamics and Commodity Prices

An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Agricultural Product Price Fluctuations on China’s Grain Yield

Intraday Effects Analysis of Chinese Futures Markets

Comparing the correlation length of grain markets in China and France

THE EMPIRICAL MERIT OF STRUCTURAL EXPLANATIONS OF COMMODITY PRICE VOLATILITY: REVIEW AND PERSPECTIVES

Maximum Likelihood Estimation of the Standard Commodity Storage Model: Evidence from Sugar Prices

Theory of storage implications in the European natural gas market

Asymmetric Effects of Prices and Storage on Rig Counts: Evidence from the US Natural Gas and Crude Oil Markets

The Relationship Between Interest Rates and Agricultural Commodity Price Dynamics

Market Emergence and Transition: Arbitrage, Transaction Costs, and Autarky in China'S Grain Markets

On the Economics of Commodity Price Dynamics and Price Volatility

On the Pricing of Storable Commodities

Are there asymmetric relations between real interest rates and agricultural commodity prices? Testing for threshold effects of US real interest rates and adjusted wheat, corn, and soybean prices

The Impact of Stocks on Correlations between Crop Yields and Prices and on Revenue Insurance Premiums using Semiparametric Quantile Regression