Abstract:This paper presents a detailed model-data comparative study of the 17 March 2015 geomagnetic storm using the high-resolution version of the thermosphere-ionosphere-electrodynamic general circulation model and the total electron content observations from a dense global navigation satellite system network. Driven by time-dependent high-latitude ionospheric convection and auroral precipitation inputs, together with an empirically defined subauroral plasma stream (SAPS) field, our simulation reproduce many observed storm-related ionospheric phenomena, including large-scale traveling ionospheric disturbances over Europe, the effects of prompt penetration electric field over South and Central America, and the formation of a storm-enhanced density (SED) plume across the continental United States. Our simulation results reaffirm a number of important characteristics concerning the SED plume: (1) enhanced background ionospheric density is a necessary but not sufficient condition, and enhanced ion drift is required to form the SED plume; (2) the SAPS flow channel does not directly transport the plasma from midnight to postnoon via dusk to form the SED plume, instead, the SED plume is formed at the equatorward and westward edge of the SAPS channel; and (3) the SED plume appears to subcorotate with respect to the Earth. Plain Language Summary Storm-induced ionospheric density variations are a major concern of near-Earth space environment as they could drastically disrupt satellite navigation and telecommunication systems. Although ionospheric disturbances such as traveling ionospheric disturbances (TIDs) and storm-enhanced density (SED) are commonly observed during geomagnetic storms, accurate specification of these phenomena remains a great challenge for geospace models. This paper presents a detailed model-data comparative study of the well-known March 2015 St. Patrick's Day storm. The simulated TIDs and SED structures from the thermosphere-ionosphere-electrodynamic general circulation model (TIEGCM) are compared with the total electron content observations for a dense global navigation satellite system (GNSS) network over Europe, South and Central America, as well as North America. While the model reproduces many observed storm-related ionospheric features, quantitative differences between the simulation results and the GNSS data indicate that further improvements to the TIEGCM (such as a more realistic, self-consistent electrodynamic coupling of the ionosphere and magnetosphere) are required in order to meet the challenges of space weather specification and eventually forecast. This study not only serves a meaningful validation of our numerical model but also sheds some new lights on an apparent paradox concerning the formation of the SED plume. Key Points We have carried out a detailed model-data comparison as a way to validate the model outputs Our simulation results reproduce many observed features, including traveling ionospheric disturbances and the storm-enhanced density plume Our results shed new lights on the formation of the SED plume and its subcorotation motion

The Effect of Subauroral Polarization Streams on Ionosphere and Thermosphere During the 2015 St. Patrick's Day Storm: Global Ionosphere‐Thermosphere Model Simulations

Impacts of Subauroral Polarization Streams on Storm‐Enhanced Density Plume and Consequently on Polar Tongue of Ionization

Thermosphere and Ionosphere Response to Subauroral Polarization Streams (SAPS): Model Simulations

Evolution of the Subauroral Polarization Stream Oscillations During the Severe Geomagnetic Storm on 20 November 2003

Large-Scale Ionospheric Disturbances During the 17 March 2015 Storm: A Model-Data Comparative Study

Low- and Mid-Latitude Ionospheric Response to the 2013 St. Patrick’s Day Geomagnetic Storm in the American Sector: Global Ionosphere Thermosphere Model Simulation

Mid-latitude Thermospheric Wind Changes During the St. Patrick’s Day Storm of 2015 Observed by Two Fabry-Perot Interferometers in China

A Case Study of the Large-Scale Traveling Ionospheric Disturbances in the Eastern Asian Sector During the 2015 St. Patrick's Day Geomagnetic Storm

Magnetic Mapping Effects of Substorm Currents Leading to Auroral Poleward Expansion and Equatorward Retreat

Spatial Development of Strong Storm-Induced Ionospheric Perturbations during 25–27 August 2018

Equatorial and Low‐latitude Ionospheric Response to the 17–18 March 2015 Great Storm over Southeast Asia Longitude Sector

Observations and simulations of the ionospheric and thermospheric response to the December 2006 geomagnetic storm: Initial phase

Observations of the Ionospheric Response to the 15 December 2006 Geomagnetic Storm: Long‐duration Positive Storm Effect

Subauroral Polarization Stream on the Outer Boundary of the Ring Current During an Energetic Ion Injection Event

High‐Speed Solar Wind Imprints on the Ionosphere During the Recovery Phase of the August 2018 Geomagnetic Storm

Long‐lasting Negative Ionospheric Storm Effects in Low and Middle Latitudes During the Recovery Phase of the 17 March 2013 Geomagnetic Storm

On the Propagation of a Geoeffective Coronal Mass Ejection During 15–17 March 2015

The effect of geomagnetic storms on the total electron content over the low latitude Saudi Arab region: a focus on St. Patrick’s Day storm

Effects of Subauroral Polarization Streams on Ionospheric Radial Currents During the Geomagnetic Storm on 23 April 2023

A Simulation Study of the Equatorial Ionospheric Response to the October 2013 Geomagnetic Storm

Regional differences of the ionospheric response to the July 2012 geomagnetic storm