Weak-lensing Study in VOICE Survey - I. Shear Measurement

Liping Fu,Dezi Liu,Mario Radovich,Xiangkun Liu,Chuzhong Pan,Zuhui Fan,Giovanni Covone,Mattia Vaccari,Valeria Amaro,Massimo Brescia,Massimo Capaccioli,Demetra De Cicco,Aniello Grado,Luca Limatola,Lance Miller,Nicola R. Napolitano,Maurizio Paolillo,Giuliano Pignata
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty1579
IF: 4.8
2018-01-01
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Abstract:The VST Optical Imaging of the CDFS and ES1 Fields (VOICE) Survey is a Guaranteed Time programme carried out with the European Southern Observatory (ESO) VLT Survey Telescope (VST) telescope to provide deep optical imaging over two 4 deg(2) patches of the sky centred on the Chandra Deep Field South (CDFS) and ES1 as part of the ESO-Spitzer Imaging Extragalactic Survey. We present the cosmic shear measurement over the 4 deg(2) covering the CDFS region in the r band using LensFit. Each of the four tiles of 1 deg(2) has more than 100 exposures, of which more than 50 exposures passed a series of image quality selection criteria for weak-lensing study. The 5 sigma limiting magnitude in r band is 26.1 for point sources, which is greater than or similar to 1 mag deeper than other weak-lensing survey in the literature [e.g. the Kilo Degree Survey (KiDS) at VST]. The photometric redshifts are estimated using the VOICE u, g, r, i together with near-infrared VIDEO data Y, J, H, K-s. The mean redshift of the shear catalogue is 0.87, considering the shear weight. The effective galaxy number density is 16.35 gal arcmin(-2), which is nearly twice the one of KiDS. The performance of LensFit on such a deep data set was calibrated using VOICE-like mock image simulations. Furthermore, we have analysed the reliability of the shear catalogue by calculating the star-galaxy cross-correlations, the tomographic shear correlations of two redshift bins and the contaminations of the blended galaxies. As a further sanity check, we have constrained cosmological parameters by exploring the parameter space with Population Monte Carlo sampling. For a flat Lambda cold dark matter model, we have obtained Sigma(8) = sigma(8)(Omega(m)/0.3)(0.5) = 0.68(-0.15)(+0.11).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?