Abstract:BACKGROUND: Over the past decade, the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) has established new techniques to reduce curve severity and shifted to include the regular use of pedicle screws. Few studies have focused on this evolving trend in AIS correction surgery. In this study, we investigated how the operative approach, instrumentation, and surgical techniques have changed over the past 15 years and to quantify the related improvements in AIS surgical treatment. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of a prospective AIS registry in a single center. Patient data were reviewed from January 2001 to December 2015. The age and surgical case distribution were recorded for each year. Trends in classification use, instrumentation types, levels of fusion, and surgical approaches were analyzed by year. The major Cobb angles and correction rates were compared between different instrumentations and surgical approaches. RESULTS: A total of 2530 patients with AIS (83.0% female) were included, with a mean age of 15.14 years. Most patients underwent surgery at 14 years of age (473 patients, 18.7%), followed by 15 years of age (468 patients, 18.5%). In our center, the classification of patients with AIS shifted from the King classification to the Lenke classification in 2005. The major baseline Cobb angle of the entire cohort averaged 50.99 and this mean Cobb angle decreased to 14.41 after surgery. The correction rates for the first 3 years (2001-2003) were less than 70%, whereas the correction rates for the rest of the years were all greater than 70%. In addition, significantly higher correction rates were observed in patients with Cobb angles <90' (72.93% vs. 55.61%, P < 0.001). A total of 218 anterior-only surgeries and 109 combined anteroposterior surgeries were performed; the remaining 2205 surgeries were performed with a posterior-only approach. The use of anterior-only and anteroposterior approaches trended to decrease after 2005. The correction rate of anterior-only approaches was significantly greater than posterior-only and anteroposterior approaches (77.86%, 72.51%, and 59.37%, respectively). In patients corrected with a posterior-only approach, the screw-hook hybrid construct was used in 342 patients, whereas the all-pedicle-screw construct was used in 1835 patients. The shift from hybrid to all-screw construct occurred in 2006. In patients with thoracic AIS, the correction rate was significantly higher in the allscrew group (73.26% vs. 67.76%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Consistent improvement of major curve correction has been achieved by the spine community over 15 years. After stabilized coronal correction and fewer fusion levels, the next steps in this evolution are the restoration of sagittal profiles, especially the hypokyphosis seen in patients with Lenke 1, the posterior minimally invasive approach, and a fast-track return to activity.

Anterior Vs Posterior Instrumentation for Lenke Type 1 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A 1:1 Matched Comparison with Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up

Anterior Selective Lumbar Fusion Saving More Distal Fusion Segments Compared with Posterior Approach in the Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis with Lenke Type 5: A Cohort Study with More Than 8-Year Follow-up

Anterior versus posterior approach in Lenke type 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison of long-term follow-up outcomes

Cosmetic and Radiological Outcome after Surgical Treatment in Lenke 5C Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients: A Comparison of Anterior Versus Posterior Approaches

Minimally invasive surgery versus standard posterior approach for Lenke Type 1–4 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a multicenter, retrospective study

Surgical outcomes of anterior instrumentation and fusion for Lenke 5 AIS：a comparison between the left and right curve

Comparison of Spontaneous Correction in Thoracic Curves after Anterior Versus Posterior Selective Fusion in Lenke Type 5C Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

The changes of relative position of the thoracic aorta after anterior or posterior instrumentation of type I Lenke curve in adolescent idiopathic thoracic scoliosis

Three-dimensional Finite Element Simulation of Surgical Correction for Lenke 2 Type Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Posterior-only Correction Surgery for Idiopathic Scoliosis Lenke Type 5c: Differences of Strategies and Outcomes Between Adult Patients and Adolescent Patients

Comparision of interval and consecutive pedicle screw placement for Lenke 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Does Symmetric Thoracic Fusion Make a Difference in Lenke 1 A/B AIS Patients?

Fifteen Years and 2530 Patients: the Evolution of Instrumentation, Surgical Strategies, and Outcomes in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis in a Single Institution.

Comparison of Thoracoscopic Anterior Release Combined With Posterior Spinal Fusion Versus Posterior-only Approach With an All-pedicle Screw Construct in the Treatment of Rigid Thoracic Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Mini-open Anterior Instrumentation with Diaphragm Sparing for Thoracolumbar Idiopathic Scoliosis: Its Technique and Clinical Results

Comparative Analysis of Interval, Skipped, and Key-vertebral Pedicle Screw Strategies for Correction in Patients With Lenke Type 1 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Comparison of Surgical Outcome of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis and Young Adult Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Match-Pair Analysis of 160 Patients.

Combined Anterior-Posterior Versus Posterior-only Spinal Fusion in Treating Dystrophic Neurofibromatosis Scoliosis With Modern Instrumentation A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Minimally Invasive Scoliosis Surgery Assisted by O-arm Navigation for Lenke Type 5C Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: a Comparison with Standard Open Approach Spinal Instrumentation.

Selective Fusion in Lenke 5 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Screw Placement at the Apex Alters Surgical Outcomes of Moderate Lenke 1 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.