Multigap Superconductivity in ThAsFeN Investigated Using Μsr Measurements

Devashibhai Adroja,Amitava Bhattacharyya,Pabitra Kumar Biswas,Michael Smidman,Adrian D. Hillier,Huican Mao,Huiqian Luo,Guang-Han Cao,Zhicheng Wang,Cao Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.96.144502
2017-01-01
Abstract:We have investigated the superconducting ground state of the newly discovered superconductor ThFeAsN with a tetragonal layered crystal structure using resistivity, magnetization, heat capacity, and transverse-field muon-spin rotation ($\mathrm{TF}\ensuremath{-}\ensuremath{\mu}\mathrm{SR}$) measurements. Our magnetization and heat-capacity measurements reveal an onset of bulk superconductivity with ${T}_{c}\ensuremath{\sim}30\phantom{\rule{0.28em}{0ex}}\mathrm{K}$. A nonlinear magnetic-field dependence of the specific heat coefficient $\ensuremath{\gamma}(H)$ has been found in the low-temperature limit, which indicates that there is a nodal energy gap. Our analysis of the $\mathrm{TF}\ensuremath{-}\ensuremath{\mu}\mathrm{SR}$ results shows that the temperature dependence of the superfluid density is better described by a two-gap model either isotropic $s+s$ wave or $s+d$ wave than a single-gap isotropic $s$-wave model for the superconducting gap, consistent with other Fe-based superconductors. The combination of $\ensuremath{\gamma}(H)$ and $\mathrm{TF}\ensuremath{-}\ensuremath{\mu}\mathrm{SR}$ results suggest that the ($s+d$)-wave model is the most consistent candidate for the gap structure of ThFeAsN. The observation of two gaps in ThFeAsN suggests a multiband nature of the superconductivity possibly arising from the $d$ bands of Fe ions. Furthermore, from our $\mathrm{TF}\ensuremath{-}\ensuremath{\mu}\mathrm{SR}$ study we have estimated the magnetic penetration depth in the polycrystalline sample of ${\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{L}(0)=375\phantom{\rule{0.28em}{0ex}}\mathrm{nm}$, superconducting carrier density ${n}_{s}=4.97\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{27}\phantom{\rule{0.28em}{0ex}}{\mathrm{m}}^{\ensuremath{-}3}$, and carrier's effective-mass ${m}^{*}=2.48{m}_{e}$. We compare the results of our present paper with those reported for the Fe-pnictide families of superconductors.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?