Effects of A Short Intervention of AIS and PNF on College Students' Shoulder Flexibility

Chunmei Cao,Chongyao Xiao,Jingmin Liu,Yu Liu,Weimo Zhu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000519950.79486.d2
2017-01-01
Abstract:Both Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) and Active Isolated Stretching (AIS) are widely used stretching techniques, but their difference in improving shoulder flexibility has not been evaluated. PURPOSE: To compare the effects of a 2-wk AIS and PNF intervention on the flexibility of shoulder joints. METHODS: Twenty male college physical education students (21.46±1.18 yr., height: 172.91±4.48 cm, mass:74.37±6.34 kg) without shoulder injury volunteered for the study. They were randomly divided into two intervention groups, one AIS and the other PNF intervention, with both met 5 times a week, 15 minutes each, for two weeks. Joint mobility (flexion and stretch) was measured by F-JDC type joint measurement scale before and after the intervention. Paired t-test and effect size (ES, Cohen’s d) were calculated to determine the difference between AIS and PNF. RESULTS: There was no statistical significant difference between the groups before the intervention. There were significant improvements in both groups (P<0.01), but greater improvement was found in the post-intervention AIS group (flexion: 4.1±0.86; stretch: 1.96±0.003; P < 0.001).Table: The change of shoulder flexibility before and after AIS and PNFCONCLUSIONS: Both of the methods can improve the flexibility of the shoulder joints, but AIS shows more effective. Corresponding author: Jingmin Liu Study was supported by Independent scientific research plan of Ministry of Education (20121088023)
What problem does this paper attempt to address?