M86. Volumetric Reductions in Global and Regional—Reward Related—Brain Structures in Schizophrenia and Comorbid Metabolic Syndrome

Jessica de Nijs,Martijn Koevoets,Manabu Kubota,Neeltje van Haren,Rene Kahn,Wiepke Cahn
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbx022.081
2017-01-01
Schizophrenia Bulletin
Abstract:Background: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is highly prevalent in schizophrenia. Unhealthy lifestyles, such as overeating, smoking and sedentary behavior are more common in schizophrenia than in the general population and play an important role in the development of MetS (Papanastasiou, 2012). Key to adaptive health behavior is the ability to evaluate reward and risk accurately, which is mediated by the reward circuit in the brain (Haber and Knutson, 2010). This is implicated in schizophrenia (De Leeuw et al., 2014). Examining MetS in relation to these reward areas informs us about the neural circuitry that may drive unhealthy behavior and MetS prevalence in schizophrenia. Methods: Seventy-one patients with schizophrenia (age/SD = 29.6 ± 5.8) were divided in 2 groups, those with MetS (MetS+; n = 23) and without (MetS−; n = 48). With ANCOVAs we examined global structural MRI differences between MetS+ and MetS− groups in volumes of total brain, grey matter, white matter, ventricles, and in regional volumes of orbitofrontal cortex, insula, anterior cingulate cortex, striatum, amygdala and thalamus. Furthermore, as an exploratory step we investigated cortical thickness and surface area of significantly different volumes. Results: Patients with schizophrenia and MetS compared to those without MetS had significantly smaller total brain (P = .016) and grey matter (P = .003) volumes, a larger ventricular volume (P = .012), and smaller orbitofrontal cortex (P = .002) and insula (P = .005) volumes, which was FDR corrected, with age, gender and intracranial volume as covariates. The volume reductions in orbitofrontal cortex and insula were driven by their cortical surface area (P = .007; P = .024, respectively). Conclusion: Patients with schizophrenia and MetS compared to those without MetS had smaller global brain volumes (ie, total brain, grey matter, ventricles) as well as regional structural reductions in orbitofrontal cortex and insula, both structures implicated in the reward circuitry. This suggests that faulty reward circuitry might lead to an increased rate of MetS in schizophrenia. References 1. De Leeuw M, Kahn RS, Vink M. Fronto–striatal dysfunction during reward processing in unaffected siblings of schizophrenia patients. Schizophr Bull. 2015;41(1):94–103. 2. Haber SN, Knutson B. The reward circuit: linking primate anatomy and human imaging. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010;35(1):4–26. 3. Papanastasiou E. Interventions for the metabolic syndrome in schizophrenia: a review. Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab. 2012;3(5):141–162.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?