Extranodal Natural Killer T-Cell Lymphoma, Nasal-Type-A New Staging System from Cswog-A Multicenter Study.

Tongyu Lin,Huangming Hong,Chaoyong Liang,He Huang,Chengcheng Guo,Ying Tian,Tingzhi Liu,Mengping Zhang,Xueying Li,Xiaohong Fu,Zhao Wang,Xiaojie Fang,Xiaoting Lin,Shanshan Li,Jia Tian Lin,Raj Shrestha Prem,Sheng Ye,Jiqun Yi,Yanhong Deng,Jian Xiao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2014.32.15_suppl.8552
IF: 45.3
2014-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:8552 Background: Extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type (ENKTL), is a rare and high aggressive disease with poor prognosis. The Ann Arbor staging system had been unable to define ENKTL staging in specific way. This study conduct a new staging system specified for ENKTL, which can identify poor prognostic patients who need more aggressive therapy. Methods: Based on the primary studied of one single center consecutive patients diagnosed as ENKTL treated with CHOP-like regimens on ASCO meeting 2008, the new staging system was established as stage I: lesions confined within nasal cavity or nasopharynx without local invasiveness (paranasal sinuses or bony or skin invasion); stage II: localized disease with local invasiveness; stage III: localized disease with regional lymph node involvement (cervical lymph nodes); stage IV: disseminated disease (lymph nodes on both sides of diaphragm, multiple extranodal site). We further undertaken two multicenter study, one retrospective analyzed the patients treated with CHOP-like to confirm the new system and the other prospective validate the new system in current treatment modality containing L-asp-based chemotherapy in ENKTL. Results: A total of 821 patients with final diagnosis of ENKTL (ranging 9-90 years old) were included. Among them 588 were retrospective studied between Jan 2000 and Jun 2008, and 233 were prospective studied from Jul 2008 to Dec 2012. The distribution of all patients using the new system compared with Ann Arbor system were stage I: 19.6% vs 56.9%; stage II: 38.1% vs 20.1%; stage III: 17.8% vs 7.2%; stage IV: 24.5% vs 15.8%, respectively. In the retrospective study, the 5-year OS rate of stage I to IV using the new system were 63%, 51%, 38% and 29% compared with 55%, 45%, 15% and 29% using the Ann Arbor system, respectively. For prospective study, the 5-year OS rate of stage I to IV of the new system were 82%, 73%, 67% and 54%, respectively, while stage IV was better than stage III (74% vs 47%) when the Ann Arbor system was adopted. Conclusions: The new staging system with a more balanced distribution and a superior prognostic discrimination as compared with the Ann Abor staging system is more suitable for ENKTL and should be recommended used in the future.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?