Work paradigm as a moderator between cognitive factors and behaviors – A comparison of mechanical and rebar workers

Pin-Chao Liao,Bingsheng Liu,Yanqing Wang,Xiaoyun Wang,Tsenguun Ganbat
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-017-0091-2
IF: 2.115
2017-01-01
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering
Abstract:Since human behavior has been argued as one of the most critical leading indicators of accidents, effective intervention in workers’ behavior may foster improved safety performance. Given that human behavior is directed by cognition, researchers have proposed various cognitive models of human behavior in order to provide a clearer understanding of how to allocate management resources. However, the influence of human cognition on behavior remains an overarching concept, rather than providing an understanding of the heterogeneity among various trades. Therefore, cognition research provides no guidance regarding how to strategically allocate management resources such as training. This study employed structural equation modeling to identify the cognitive structures of two trades (reinforcing steel bar and elevator workers). We find that the cognitive structures of workers in these sample trades are significantly different, indicating that management strategies should vary accordingly. Training of mechanical workers should focus on crew leads, who can further influence self-efficacy, risk comparisons, and workers’ perception of external conditions. For rebar crews, safety training should focus on self-supporting defense capability and elucidating dangerous behaviors. External conditions have a significant role in ensuring worker safety; safe facilities engender safe behaviors. This study lays a foundation of strategic resource allocation for behavioral management on construction jobsites.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?