Abstract:Purpose Kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography (kVCBCT)‐guided adaptive radiation therapy (ART) uses daily deformed CT (dCT), which is generated automatically through deformable registration methods. These registration methods may perform poorly in reproducing volumes of the target organ, rectum, and bladder during treatment. We analyzed the registration errors between the daily kVCBCTs and corresponding dCTs for these organs using the default optical flow algorithm and two registration procedures. We validated the effectiveness of these registration methods in replicating the geometry for dose calculation on kVCBCT for ART. Methods We evaluated three deformable image registration (DIR) methods to assess their registration accuracy and dose calculation effeciency in mapping target and critical organs. The DIR methods include (1) default intensity‐based deformable registration, (2) hybrid deformable registration, and (3) a two‐step deformable registration process. Each technique was applied to a computerized imaging reference system (CIRS) phantom (Model 062 M) and to five patients who received volumetric modulated arc therapy to the prostate. Registration accuracy was assessed using the 95% Hausdorff distance (HD95) and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), and each method was compared with the intensity‐based registration method. The improvement in the dCT image quality of the CIRS phantom and five patients was assessed by comparing dCT with kVCBCT. Image quality quantitative metrics for the phantom included the signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR), uniformity, and contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR), whereas those for the patients included the mean absolute error (MAE), mean error, peak signal‐to‐noise ratio (PSNR), and structural similarity index measure (SSIM). To determine dose metric differences, we used a dose‐volume histogram (DVH) and 3.0%/0.3 mm gamma analysis to compare planning computed tomography (pCT) and kVCBCT recalculations with restimulated CT images used as a reference. Results The dCT images generated by the hybrid (dCTH) and two‐step (dCTC) registration methods resulted in significant improvements compared to kVCBCT in the phantom model. Specifically, the SNR improved by 107% and 107.2%, the uniformity improved by 90% and 75%, and the CNR improved by 212.2% and 225.6 for dCTH and dCTC methods, respectively. For the patient images, the MAEs improved by 98% and 94%, the PSNRs improved by 16.3% and 22.9%, and the SSIMs improved by 1% and 1% in the dCTH and dCTC methods, respectively. For the geometric evaluation, only the two‐step registration method improved registration accuracy. The dCTH method yielded an average HD95 of 12 mm and average DSC of 0.73, whereas dCTC yielded an average HD95 of 2.9 mm and average DSC of 0.902. The DVH showed that the dCTC‐based dose calculations differed by 95% at all points, whereas they were <95% for kVCBCT‐based treatment plans. Conclusion The two‐step registration method outperforms the intensity‐based and hybrid registration methods. While the hybrid and two‐step‐based methods improved the image quality of kVCBCT in a linear accelerator, only the two‐step method improved the registration accuracy of the corresponding structures among the pCT and kVCBCT datasets. A two‐step registration process is recommended for applying kVCBCT to ART, which achieves better registration accuracy for local and global image structures. This method appears to be beneficial for radiotherapy dose calculation in patients with pelvic cancer.

Improved Prostate Delineation in Prostate Hdr Brachytherapy with Trus-Ct Deformable Registration Technology: A Pilot Study with Mri Validation

Comparison of Computed Tomography- and Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Target Delineation for Cervical Cancer Brachytherapy

A New CT Prostate Segmentation for CT-based HDR Brachytherapy.

Prostate Ct Segmentation Method Based on Nonrigid Registration in Ultrasound-Guided Ct-Based Hdr Prostate Brachytherapy

A Novel Ultrasound-CT Deformable Registration Process Improves Physician Contouring during CT-based HDR Brachytherapy for Prostate Cancer

Dosimetric Analysis of Radiation Treatment Plans Based on a Deep Learning Auto Contouring Model for Patients with Localized Prostate Cancer

Multiparametric MRI-guided Dose Boost to Dominant Intraprostatic Lesions in CT-based High-dose-rate Prostate Brachytherapy

Multiparametric MRI-guided High-Dose-rate Prostate Brachytherapy with Focal Dose Boost to Dominant Intraprostatic Lesions

Validation of a surface-based deformable MRI-3D ultrasound image registration algorithm toward clinical implementation for interstitial prostate brachytherapy

Real-time precision targeted prostate biopsy using transrectal ultrasound-magnetic resonance fusion

Evaluation Of The Dosimetric Impact Of Interfractional Anatomical Variations On Prostate Proton Therapy Using Daily In-Room Ct Images

MR to ultrasound image registration with segmentation-based learning for HDR prostate brachytherapy

Deformable MRI-TRUS Registration Using Biomechanically Constrained Deep Learning Model for Tumor-Targeted Prostate Brachytherapy

Dosimetric Benefit of Implanted Marker-Based Cbct Setup for Definitive Prostatic Radiotherapy

Mri-Us Registration Using Label-Driven Weakly-Supervised Learning For Multiparametric Mri-Guided Hdr Prostate Brachytherapy

CT-ultrasound deformable registration for PET-determined prostate brachytherapy

Evaluation of the geometric and dosimetric accuracies of deformable image registration of targets and critical organs in prostate CBCT‐guided adaptive radiotherapy

A MR-TRUS Registration Method for Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Interventions

Catheter Position Prediction Using Deep-Learning-based Multi-Atlas Registration for High-Dose Rate Prostate Brachytherapy.

Cbct-Guided Prostate Adaptive Radiotherapy With Cbct-Based Synthetic Mri And Ct

Approaching automated applicator digitization from a new angle: Using sagittal images to improve deep learning accuracy and robustness in high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy