Reply to Comment on “tuning of Photoluminescence and Local Structures of Substituted Cations in Xsr2ca(po4)2–(1 – X)ca10li(po4)7:Eu2+ Phosphors”

Mingyue Chen,Zhiguo Xia,Maxim. S. Molokeev,Ting Wang,Quanlin Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b01261
IF: 10.508
2017-01-01
Chemistry of Materials
Abstract:Local structure modification in solid solution is an essential part of photoluminescence tuning of rare earth doped solid state phosphors. Herein we report a new solid solution phosphor of Eu2+-doped xSr(2)Ca(PO4)(2)-(1 - x)Ca10Li(PO4)(7) (0 <= x <= 1), which share the same beta-Ca-3(PO4)(2) type structure in the full composition range. Depending on the x parameter variation in xSr(2)Ca(PO4)(2)-(1 - x)Ca10Li(PO4)(7):Eu2+, the vacancies generated in the M(4) site enable the nonlinear variation of cell parameters and volume, and this increases the magnitude of M(4)O-6 polyhedra distortion. The local structure modulation around the Eu2+ ions causes different luminescent behaviors of the two-peak emission and induces the photoluminescence tuning. The shift of the emission peaks in the solid solution phosphors with different compositions has been discussed. It remains invariable at x <= 0.5, but the red-shift is observed at x > 0.5 which is attributed to combined effect of the crystal field splitting, Stokes shift, and energy transfer between Eu2+ ions. The temperature-dependent luminescence measurements are also performed, and it is shown that the photoionization process is responsible for the quenching effect.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?