Abstract:Due to the complexity of software systems, defects are inevitable. Understanding the types of defects could help developers to adopt measures in current and future software releases. In practice, developers often categorize defects into various types. One common categorization is based on fault triggers of defects. Fault trigger is a set of conditions which activate a defect (i.e., Fault) and propagate the defect into a failure. In general, there are two types of defect based fault triggering conditions, Bohrbug and Mandelbug. Bohrbug refers to a bug which can be easily isolated, and its activation and error propagation is simple. Mandelbug refers to a bug whose activation and/or error propagation is complex (e.g., A time lag between the fault activation and the failure occurrence). With these category labels, developers can better perform post-mortem analysis to identify common characteristic of the defects, and design specific fault-tolerance mechanisms. However, in most software systems, these category labels are often unavailable. To address this problem, in this paper, we propose a text mining solution which categorize defects into fault trigger categories by analyzing the natural-language description of bug reports. A previous study shows that Mandelbug is more complex and needs more time to be fixed. Thus, to better identify Mandelbugs, we propose a novel Fuzzy Set based Feature Selection algorithm named USES, which selects the features (i.e., Terms) which have high ability to distinguish Mandelbugs from Bohrbugs. USES first caches a set of terms based on their fuzzy affinity scores to Bohrbug or Mandelbug. Next, it iterates many times, and in each iteration, it selects a subset of terms, and builds a classifier on these terms. USES selects the classifier and the terms which could achieve the best performance on a training data. We evaluate our solution on 4 datasets including Linux, Mysql, Apache HTTPD, and AXIS containing a total of 809 bug reports. We show that USES with naive Bayes multinomial achieves the best performance, it achieves Mandelbug F-measure scores of 0.298 - 0.615. We also compare USES with other baseline approaches. The results show that USES on average improves Mandelbug F-measure scores of the best performing baseline by 12.3%.

Software Defect Model Based on Similarity and Association Rule

Unifying Defect Prediction, Categorization, and Repair by Multi-Task Deep Learning

Automatic Defect Categorization Based on Fault Triggering Conditions

Development and Application of Quality Assurance and Rating Software Program for Power Equipment Defect Texts

Investigating Associative Classification for Software Fault Prediction: an Experimental Perspective.

Understanding machine learning software defect predictions

A novel software defect prediction approach via weighted classification based on association rule mining

Software Severe Defects Evaluation Based on Complex Network Analysis

An AST-Based Approach to Classifying Defects

Software Defect Prediction Model Based on Attention Mechanism

Combined Classifier for Cross-Project Defect Prediction: an Extended Empirical Study.

Towards an Understanding of Intra-Defect Associations: Implications for Defect Prediction

Using Models To Assess Impact Of Defective Software

A Model for Predicting Software Defect Based on Distrustable Factor

Defect Identification, Categorization, and Repair: Better Together

Software defect prediction model based on improved twin support vector machines

Assessing Software Quality by Program Clustering and Defect Prediction

Enhancing Defect Prediction with Static Defect Analysis.

Software-defect prediction within and across projects based on improved self-organizing data mining

Research on Software Defect Prediction and Analysis Based on Machine Learning

Research on Defect Detection Technology of Trusted Behavior Decision Tree Based on Intelligent Data Semantic Analysis of Massive Data